The joint statement issued by Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and US President Barack Obama on Nov. 17 was cause for concern. Taiwan was further marginalized in the triangle of relations between Taiwan, the US and China and is now in an unprecedented predicament. Taiwan must amend the Referendum Act (公民投票法) to state that “cross-strait agreements shall be decided by public referendum.”
That is the only way for a united Taiwan to deal with the enormous pressure for political talks this nation can now expect from Hu.
The joint statement did not mention the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) — which governs Washington’s Taiwan policy — but did mention the three Sino-US joint communiques.
territorial integrity
The statement also treated China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity as the core of the three communiques and changed Washington’s “one China policy” into a “one China principle.”
Obama even publicly supported Hu’s request for Taiwan to start cross-strait political talks soon.
The US’ promises to Taiwan weakened and Washington violated its 1982 “six assurances” to Taiwan by endorsing cross-strait political talks.
With Obama’s endorsement, Hu is expected to pile on the pressure to achieve his dream of creating an irreversible framework for unification before he steps down in 2012.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his government have said Taiwan will sign an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China in March, even though its contents remain unclear.
COMING SOON?
Hu said recently that Taiwan cannot avoid political negotiations with China, meaning that such talks are likely to be on the table soon after an ECFA is inked.
Judging from his sophistication and deviousness, Hu will ask that Taiwan make a commitment during the signing process to pave the way for political talks and an agenda for a possible Ma-Hu meeting in 2011.
Just a week before the Hu-Obama meeting, China sent a large delegation of academics to Taiwan.
Their tough stance on unification indicates that Beijing was aware of Washington’s support for cross-strait political talks in advance. In the face of both the former’s oppression and the latter’s push, Taipei is facing a crisis: Political talks seem inevitable.
The situation today is even more critical than it was in 1979, when the US established diplomatic ties with the People’s Republic of China.
The US and China are now cooperating to lead Taiwan to the slaughter.
The only solution is to strengthen the nation’s democratic mechanisms as soon as possible and give the public substantial power to decide its future.
PIVOTAL POINT
This is a pivotal moment. Taiwan must amend the Referendum Act and build a consensus on the need for cross-strait decisions to be made by the public through plebiscites.
Referendums on this would endow the public with a right that reaches beyond the blue-green divide to have their say on the nation’s future.
They would also be an effective tool to unite the public and build a domestic consensus on crucial matters.
If Taiwan does not amend the Referendum Act and put cross-strait agreements to referendums, it will find itself squeezed between China and the US into a difficult and irreversible situation.
Lai I-chung is an executive member of Taiwan Thinktank.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS