Since its launch in Taiwan during the administration of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), the Apple Daily’s role has changed, yet stayed the same. It excelled at attacking the Democratic Progressive Party, but now, with the party still struggling to find its feet and Chen locked up indefinitely, the newspaper has defied the pro-China media’s endless program of Chen-bashing. Instead, it has taken national and local Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) governments to task.
Senior members of the KMT are beginning to run out of patience with the newspaper, it seems.
The Taipei City Government, which is controlled by the KMT, fined the newspaper NT$500,000 (US$15,500) on Wednesday and another NT$500,000 on Thursday night, the latter apparently for insubordination as much as any formal transgression. The original offense was publishing animated videos — mostly of crime reconstructions — online and making these sometimes explicit and sensational videos available for download to cellphones.
It’s one thing for a government to lecture media outlets on morality and propriety, but compelling schools to discontinue subscriptions and issuing heavy fines for media presentations not contained in a print version — and which are vaguely covered by the law — is another matter entirely.
For some, the news that the Apple Daily has subscribers among elementary, middle and high schools will come as a shock. Regardless of regulatory matters, there is no denying that the newspaper’s coverage of social aberration is often lurid and distressing, particularly its use of large, bloody photographs and images of corpses. Compared with these, the largely redundant blow-by-blow graphics that accompany stories of robberies and assault seem innocuous.
Even so, the knee-jerk response by regulatory authorities — both central and regional — to challenging or inaccurate media content has been raised a notch here, and the newspaper has fought back, accusing the government of martial law-style tactics, a none-too-subtle reference to the KMT’s seedy past.
Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) has been at the forefront of the attack on the Apple Daily, and his chest-thumping recalls the speed with which he recently formed a bizarre “voluntary” association of restaurants and other outlets that pledged not to sell US beef on pain of city government fines.
For him to noisily ban the Apple Daily from schools for providing cellphone download codes for News-in-Motion clips in its print edition, however, is preposterous given that many editions of the newspaper — and those of some of its competitors — shouldn’t be in the hands of children at all. Now, with all the free publicity, every curious child in the school system will get the codes from the local convenience store’s newspaper rack without buying anything.
Hau is trying to steer media outlets away from his litany of administrative and political problems by taking just as sensationalist a line as the media outlets he decries. The Wenshan-Neihu MRT line, the shuttered Maokong Gondola, his poor relationship with President (and now party boss) Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), a generally mediocre list of “achievements” — all this will be put further inside the paper, but only for now.
As in Hong Kong, Apple Daily boss Jimmy Lai (黎智英) is more of a threat to Taiwan’s governments than they are to him. This man has stared down far more formidable opponents in Beijing and lived to tell. If KMT figureheads wish to risk packaging a political fight with Lai as a morality crusade, they will have to go about their business with a little more intelligence and tact — and without politicizing a law that has not kept up with new technology.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS