Academics claim that a person has one chance in 100 billion of becoming ill with mad cow disease if one eats 100g of US beef per day. Government officials came to the conclusion that eating US beef was safer than chewing betel nut or smoking cigarettes.
Aside from the fact that betel nut and cigarettes on the one hand and beef on the other are very different and incomparable items, the basis for making the “prediction” of disease rates was not very precise.
The incubation period of the protein that causes Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, the human form of mad-cow disease, can be as long as 50 years and there is no definitive conclusion as to whether that period for the protein causing the disease in cows is even longer.
Mad cow disease was only discovered about 30 years ago. It is therefore possible that many people in affected areas have been infected, but have not taken ill and are therefore not listed in disease statistics, leading to an underestimate of the disease rate.
How can academics “predict” disease rates for a disease that has an incubation period as long as 50 years when they only have information about the disease reaching back 30 years?
Even more worrying is that infection rates for mad cow disease could be 100 times higher than disease rates.
Many years ago, the British government conducted an immunochemistry test for the protein that causes mad cow disease in human appendix samples.
Three of 13,000 samples contained the protein, meaning one had one chance in 4,000 of being infected with mad cow disease after eating beef from the UK.
Mad cow disease is still incurable and it is unclear how prevalent it is or how it is transmitted. This lack of knowledge about the disease is a cause for global concern and Taiwanese officials should not come to any rash conclusions as to whether it is safer to eat US beef than chew betel nut or smoke cigarettes.
In the early 1980s when AIDS started to spread, the lack of understanding about HIV among people and in medical circles encouraged rash and ignorant decisions by governments, resulting in unfortunate incidents like the HIV-tainted blood scandal in which more than 1,000 hemophiliacs in Japan were infected with HIV after using imported non-heat-treated blood products tainted with the HIV virus.
Of these patients, more than 500 have already died.
For many years, countries have invested tremendous amounts of money in AIDS research. We now have a clearer idea of HIV and its means of transmission, preventive measures and treatments. Incidents like the one in Japan will not be repeated and people’s fears of HIV/AIDS have been appeased.
Given the uncertainty surrounding this relatively new threat, the government should learn from Japan’s experience with HIV-tainted blood products when dealing with mad cow disease.
The government should be more humble and listen to public fears and inject resources to encourage academics to conduct further research into mad cow disease.
Academia Sinica has many experts in medical genetics, infectious diseases, molecular biology and public health.
If the government provides adequate incentives, research could be used to dispel some of the mystery surrounding mad cow disease in the short term and, in the long term, provide prevention and treatment.
This, above all, is what the government should be doing.
Klim King is CEO of Drug Discovery at Viogene BioTek Co.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
It’s not every month that the US Department of State sends two deputy assistant secretary-level officials to Taiwan, together. Its rarer still that such senior State Department policy officers, once on the ground in Taipei, make a point of huddling with fellow diplomats from “like-minded” NATO, ANZUS and Japanese governments to coordinate their multilateral Taiwan policies. The State Department issued a press release on June 22 admitting that the two American “representatives” had “hosted consultations in Taipei” with their counterparts from the “Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” The consultations were blandly dubbed the “US-Taiwan Working Group on International Organizations.” The State
The Chinese Supreme People’s Court and other government agencies released new legal guidelines criminalizing “Taiwan independence diehard separatists.” While mostly symbolic — the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never had jurisdiction over Taiwan — Tamkang University Graduate Institute of China Studies associate professor Chang Wu-ueh (張五岳), an expert on cross-strait relations, said: “They aim to explain domestically how they are countering ‘Taiwan independence,’ they aim to declare internationally their claimed jurisdiction over Taiwan and they aim to deter Taiwanese.” Analysts do not know for sure why Beijing is propagating these guidelines now. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), deciphering the
Many local news media last week reported that COVID-19 is back, citing doctors’ observations and the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) statistics. The CDC said that cases would peak this month and urged people to take preventive measures. Although COVID-19 has never been eliminated, it has become more manageable, and restrictions were dropped, enabling people to return to their normal way of life due to decreasing hospitalizations and deaths. In Taiwan, mandatory reporting of confirmed cases and home isolation ended in March last year, while the mask mandate at hospitals and healthcare facilities stopped in May. However, the CDC last week said the number