No matter whether one views the outcry over US beef imports as a scientific, political or diplomatic problem, it is a matter of keeping mad cow disease out of Taiwan, which has so far been free of it.
Unlike Europe, the US and Japan, Taiwan has had no cases of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), commonly known as mad cow disease, or its human equivalent — the transmissible variant of Creutzfeld-Jakob Disease, variant CJD or vCJD for short.
However, objective medical evidence shows that Taiwan is more vulnerable than Europe and the US to the spread of vCJD. For the sake of this and future generations, we should resolve to keep Taiwan free of the illness, even if doing so is more costly for us than for other places.
Genetically, Taiwanese people are a high-risk group for vCJD. When scanning the gene sequences of vCJD patients, European and US scientists found three polymorphic subtypes of the prion protein gene (PRNP) at codon 129 — MM, MV and VV, referring to the pairing of amino acids methionine and valine. All patients infected with vCJD from bovine protein were found to have the MM genotype.
This finding clearly shows that people with the MM genotype are a high-risk group for infection with vCJD from cows with BSE.
In Britain, which has had more vCJD cases than any other country, only 38 percent of the population has this genotype, yet 100 percent of British vCJD patients had the MM-type gene. According to the work of Taiwanese researchers (Wang et al, 2007), as many as 98 percent of Taiwanese people have the MM genotype. It can therefore be said that almost everyone in Taiwan is a member of the high-risk group for vCJD.
UK scientists studying a 1950 outbreak of cannibalism-related human spongiform encephalopathy in Papua New Guinea, where the illness was called Kuru, found that when the disease was spread by the prion from human flesh, it could incubate in the human body for as long as 50 years (Collinge J et al, 2006).
In the Kuru case there was no species barrier to infection, since the disease-causing prion was passed from one member of the human species to another. In the case of beef prions, when they are passed from one species (cows) to another (humans), thereby crossing a species barrier, the incubation period may be even longer.
Research on the history of vCJD in the UK has shown that blood transfusions are one way in which the illness can be passed from one person to another. The scary thing is that blood donors may pass on the disease during the incubation period.
Clinical cases show that the blood of vCJD carriers is infectious for three-and-a-half years before the onset of symptoms. The vCJD prion can lurk within the human body for a long time, and at present there is no way of detecting it.
Potentially, it could be transferred through blood transfusions for up to 50 years, making the spread of the illness very hard to control.
A 2004 study revealed that in a UK survey of 12,700 surgically removed appendixes, three appendixes stained positively for prion protein accumulation. This indicates a higher-than-expected rate of CJD infection, equivalent at a national level to thousands of infected individuals (Hilton DA et al, J Pathol. 2004 Jul;203(3):733-9).
Taiwan is very densely populated and Taiwanese are accustomed to eating beef innards. These factors make it easier for mad cow disease to spread in Taiwan than in Europe and the US.
Once the infectious prion reaches Taiwan, Taiwan will be more susceptible than perhaps anywhere else in the world to the spread of vCJD in humans.
Mad cow disease has been documented in Europe, the US, Canada and Japan, but not in Taiwan. Although very few cows have been affected by the disease in the US, it is undeniable that eating imported organs and ground beef from US cattle would increase the chances of people getting vCJD in Taiwan.
To date there is no vaccine to prevent mad cow disease, and no cure for those infected. The only way to protect oneself from the illness is to avoid eating suspect beef products. Should we not, as ordinary members of the public, do what we can to keep Taiwan free of mad cow disease by refusing to eat suspect beef products?
The government and related research establishments, for their part, must fulfill their duty to inform the public. They should explain frankly that Taiwanese people are more susceptible to vCJD infection than people in other parts of the world.
Knowledge of the facts will help ordinary people understand why we should say no to products that could carry mad cow disease.
This will strengthen the public’s resolve to keep Taiwan free of the illness.
Klim King is chief executive officer of drug discovery at Viogene BioTek Corp.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record. It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation. The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company. It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to
It’s not every month that the US Department of State sends two deputy assistant secretary-level officials to Taiwan, together. Its rarer still that such senior State Department policy officers, once on the ground in Taipei, make a point of huddling with fellow diplomats from “like-minded” NATO, ANZUS and Japanese governments to coordinate their multilateral Taiwan policies. The State Department issued a press release on June 22 admitting that the two American “representatives” had “hosted consultations in Taipei” with their counterparts from the “Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” The consultations were blandly dubbed the “US-Taiwan Working Group on International Organizations.” The State
The Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercises, the largest naval exercise in the region, are aimed at deepening international collaboration and interaction while strengthening tactical capabilities and flexibility in tackling maritime crises. China was invited to participate in RIMPAC in 2014 and 2016, but it was excluded this year. The underlying reason is that Beijing’s ambitions of regional expansion and challenging the international order have raised global concern. The world has made clear its suspicions of China, and its exclusion from RIMPAC this year will bring about a sea change in years to come. The purpose of excluding China is primarily
The Chinese Supreme People’s Court and other government agencies released new legal guidelines criminalizing “Taiwan independence diehard separatists.” While mostly symbolic — the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never had jurisdiction over Taiwan — Tamkang University Graduate Institute of China Studies associate professor Chang Wu-ueh (張五岳), an expert on cross-strait relations, said: “They aim to explain domestically how they are countering ‘Taiwan independence,’ they aim to declare internationally their claimed jurisdiction over Taiwan and they aim to deter Taiwanese.” Analysts do not know for sure why Beijing is propagating these guidelines now. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), deciphering the