Vice President Vincent Siew (蕭萬長), always smiling and silent, has once again been entrusted with an important position by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). Ma appointed Siew as the “chief architect” and director of the committee organizing the 100th anniversary celebrations of what is now a nominal Republic of China (ROC) in 2011.
Hopefully, Siew will live up to Ma’s expectations and put on a presentable show.
Siew has done this kind of job twice in the past, and both times they have turned out to be shams. After eight years of treading water, he returned to politics to serve as Ma’s running mate in last year’s presidential election becoming the “chief architect” of the effort to shape Ma’s image as a “Taiwan-loving” man, while endorsing Ma and guaranteeing that he would not sell out the country.
After winning the election, however, Ma ignored public suffering and revealed his true colors as he has succumbed to China at the expense of Taiwanese sovereignty. As Ma’s accomplice, how could Siew serve as Ma’s stand-in with a clear conscience?
As the government’s economic coordinator, Siew has promoted an economic strategy of relying on China in the belief that it will help kick start Taiwan’s economy. But after a year and a half of the Ma administration, the nation is suffering economic recession, high unemployment, large government debt and the migration of domestic capital and technology to China. Taiwan has been transformed from an Asian tiger into a docile kitten.
These two failures stemmed from mistaken premises. Siew touted Ma’s “Taiwan-loving” image on the mistaken assumption that Ma was sincere and trustworthy, but those are two qualities Ma has all but squandered. Siew’s design of Ma’s image succeeded in tricking people into voting for him, but it was a vicious swindle at the expense of the Taiwanese people.
Furthermore, Siew mischaracterized the Chinese economy as a free market economy, when in reality, it is politically directed — China uses the economy as a political tool to achieve its goal of annexing Taiwan. Using the EU as an example to excuse shackling Taiwan’s economy to China’s is nothing but an act of deception, both to oneself but also to the public at large. Each EU member is a sovereign state that recognizes each of the other member states — they do not seek to annex other members.
If Siew, as the coordinator of the ROC’s 100th anniversary celebrations, wants to live up to public expectations, the priority should be to make sure the centenarian has nothing to do with the People’s Republic of China (PRC). If the founders of the ROC had not defined their goals, but instead just fought to overthrow the Qing Dynasty, they would never have won public support.
Siew should invite the PRC, the US and Japan to the event and let China broadcast the celebrations live on Chinese TV. The ROC government should only invite them because it is the polite and friendly thing to do.
James Wang is a media commentator.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS