The battle is on for the year-end mayoral, county commissioner and city and county councilor elections. The government’s plan to upgrade several cities and counties to special municipality status may have brought a certain level of disorder to the electoral process, thereby highlighting the importance of the year-end elections.
Only by preparing well for the year-end election campaign will it be possible to pave the way for next year’s special municipality elections. Just as in the recent Yunlin legislative by-election, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the green camp must unite to achieve the results they want.
The DPP has made this year’s election campaign slogan “Green rule is the best quality assurance.” While it may be an old slogan and although the DPP underperformed in some ways during its eight years in power, a comparison with President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) reveals that the slogan embodies several of the party’s past strong points.
I believe the DPP should amend that slogan by adding “Protect local areas and besiege the central government.” More directly, “protecting local areas” means retaining local government control. There are lots of other things we need to protect — like water, soil and other environmental resources as people have learned following the Typhoon Morakot disaster. The residents of Penghu (澎湖) set a good example for the rest of us by opposing the opening of casinos there.
This protection should of course also include the economy. Many rural areas rely on agriculture, which is often associated with being backward. This is one of the negative effects of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) view that they would only be brief guests in Taiwan.
They overdeveloped certain areas while ignoring others, which increased the gap between urban and rural areas.
However, agriculture still needs to be emphasized, for it is counties like Yunlin that are based on agriculture that have experienced the biggest increases in the cost of living, exemplified by price increases after Morakot. Furthermore, the cost of basic living items is not rising in Taiwan; but the government is arbitrarily raising taxes to benefit big businesses and certain cities. This could set off a new wave of inflation and public suffering.
In addition, we must find new methods to protect Taiwan’s small and medium enterprises to prevent the lifeblood of Taiwan’s economy from being washed away by China once the KMT throws the doors wide open to Chinese businesses.
“Protecting local areas” also involves protecting local culture. Without Taiwan’s languages, music, opera and movies, Taiwan would be a spiritual void. The vitality of songs in Hoklo (also known as Taiwanese) has given birth to a group of excellent musicians such as Ye Chun-lin (葉俊麟) and Tyzen Hsiao (蕭泰然). What does China’s Fujian province have to offer? Many local governments in Taiwan still preserve buildings reflecting Taiwanese history. Tainan excels in this respect. However, in a pan-blue controlled area like Miaoli, people are willing to spend huge sums to build a Ma museum while they don’t think twice about knocking down the chimney of a kiln tied to the long history of Taiwanese pottery.
If we are unable to retain control of local governments, we will be unable to protect Taiwan. If we can retain local government control, we will be able to come up with solutions to trip Ma up even if his administration submits to China. In addition, we need to tap into the energy in local areas to support the special municipality elections next year as well as future legislative and presidential elections. We must regain government power lest Taiwan remain a temporary dwelling for a few highly privileged Mainlander “agents” who are “helping” China look after this place for the time being.
By “besieging the central government” I mean forming a resistance that will stop Taiwan from being handed over to China on a silver platter and keep Taiwanese free of enslavement by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Rule with the threat of violence is not peace. And removing the missiles the CCP has aimed at Taiwan does not constitute peace either because those missiles can be replaced any time China wants.
When Chinese envoy Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) visited Taiwan last year, Taiwanese showed their strength by protesting and surrounding Chen and his entourage and by distracting members of the KMT-CCP forum from collaborating to sell out Taiwan. This time around, they don’t dare hold the meeting in Taipei, Kaohsiung or Tainan. Instead, they have chosen a place under pan-blue rule — Taichung. We must not allow the communists a chance to gain a foothold in Taiwan. This is the only way we can protect Taiwan’s national security and guarantee the rights of our people.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS