Reasons don’t/do matter
Dear Johnny,
You challenged: “Explain why the BBC would be ‘dishonest’” (Johnny Neihu’s Mailbag, Oct. 17, page 8). Are you asking me to explain their motivations, or do you want me to draw a Venn diagram comparing the BBC’s reports, China’s claims and the facts for uninformed readers?
If it’s the former, I don’t know that the reasons matter so much as getting readers to take notice of such behavior, since it’s highly improbable (by which I mean “an utter impossibility”) that they’ll stop doing it. As I point out in the Taiwan Matters blog, the BBC’s “diligent ‘laziness’” ensures that well-crafted memes get repeated endlessly — and rarely (ie, only on days when TVBS isn’t attacking Chen Shui-bian) in Taiwan’s favor.
If it’s the latter, the arguments are presented step-by-step (with links) in the blog post I linked to in my earlier letter and in the 11 previous installations of the series.
TIM MADDOG
Johnny replies: I’m not really convinced. Stubborn, incompetent, plodding, lazy ... all might explain the BBC’s casual treatment of Taiwan. “Dishonest” suggests a hidden agenda, so the reasons do matter.
A big-nose perspective
Dear Johnny,
To quote you: “In the meantime, what are you, as a person most locals would regard as a foreigner, willing and able to do, other than write letters to me?” (Johnny Neihu’s Mailbag, Oct. 17, page 8).
Well, I read some BBC Web pages and wrote them a letter. I do hope they print it. I know I’ll get a polite reply that they have received my comment, and that they thank me for my contribution. However, they’ll say, we can’t assure you that it will get printed and yada yada yada.
I can’t do anything else except write to you and hope to educate the electorate. Which is a tacit way of saying that you should translate foreigners’ letters for your sister paper.
I would hope that some Taiwanese could see the perspective of us dabizi (大鼻子)!
We foreigners have seen things here and back home, as well as in China and all over the Earth. Any civilized and rational person would not be in the KMT’s favor. Most of my friends agree that the only reason the KMT clings to power is because so many of its voters are direct beneficiaries: teachers, soldiers, civil servants. How can the DPP get more votes with only 40 percent of the vote belonging to “farmers”?
The only way I can help, Johnny, is by reminding voters to punish the KMT in the year-end elections.
I believe that on one of those BBC pages I saw a stat I thought was wrong. Correct me if I’m wrong, but did the DPP ever have control of the Legislative Yuan? Let me know, Johnny, and in time we’ll see if the BBC will hire me.
HARRY ADAMOPOULOS
Johnny replies: The DPP has never controlled the legislature. And if the BBC hires you, don’t tell Tim Maddog.
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS