Reasons don’t/do matter
Dear Johnny,
You challenged: “Explain why the BBC would be ‘dishonest’” (Johnny Neihu’s Mailbag, Oct. 17, page 8). Are you asking me to explain their motivations, or do you want me to draw a Venn diagram comparing the BBC’s reports, China’s claims and the facts for uninformed readers?
If it’s the former, I don’t know that the reasons matter so much as getting readers to take notice of such behavior, since it’s highly improbable (by which I mean “an utter impossibility”) that they’ll stop doing it. As I point out in the Taiwan Matters blog, the BBC’s “diligent ‘laziness’” ensures that well-crafted memes get repeated endlessly — and rarely (ie, only on days when TVBS isn’t attacking Chen Shui-bian) in Taiwan’s favor.
If it’s the latter, the arguments are presented step-by-step (with links) in the blog post I linked to in my earlier letter and in the 11 previous installations of the series.
TIM MADDOG
Johnny replies: I’m not really convinced. Stubborn, incompetent, plodding, lazy ... all might explain the BBC’s casual treatment of Taiwan. “Dishonest” suggests a hidden agenda, so the reasons do matter.
A big-nose perspective
Dear Johnny,
To quote you: “In the meantime, what are you, as a person most locals would regard as a foreigner, willing and able to do, other than write letters to me?” (Johnny Neihu’s Mailbag, Oct. 17, page 8).
Well, I read some BBC Web pages and wrote them a letter. I do hope they print it. I know I’ll get a polite reply that they have received my comment, and that they thank me for my contribution. However, they’ll say, we can’t assure you that it will get printed and yada yada yada.
I can’t do anything else except write to you and hope to educate the electorate. Which is a tacit way of saying that you should translate foreigners’ letters for your sister paper.
I would hope that some Taiwanese could see the perspective of us dabizi (大鼻子)!
We foreigners have seen things here and back home, as well as in China and all over the Earth. Any civilized and rational person would not be in the KMT’s favor. Most of my friends agree that the only reason the KMT clings to power is because so many of its voters are direct beneficiaries: teachers, soldiers, civil servants. How can the DPP get more votes with only 40 percent of the vote belonging to “farmers”?
The only way I can help, Johnny, is by reminding voters to punish the KMT in the year-end elections.
I believe that on one of those BBC pages I saw a stat I thought was wrong. Correct me if I’m wrong, but did the DPP ever have control of the Legislative Yuan? Let me know, Johnny, and in time we’ll see if the BBC will hire me.
HARRY ADAMOPOULOS
Johnny replies: The DPP has never controlled the legislature. And if the BBC hires you, don’t tell Tim Maddog.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS