Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾) is a woman with enemies. That is clear regardless of whether one believes her claims that she has received threats from anonymous individuals for criticizing her own party.
The most recent manifestation of this was a proposal submitted to her party’s Central Advisory Council on Sunday that unmistakeably targeted her. The proposal called for “unsuitable” legislators-at-large to resign or face scrutiny by the KMT’s Disciplinary Committee.
It is not clear what, if anything, will come of this proposal. It may be meant as a warning to Lo, who has made enemies within the KMT because of her very public criticism of some of her party’s policies and the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
Lo’s sharp tongue makes her a more credible voice than other KMT figures. Unlike most criticism within the party, Lo’s positions present themselves as more issue-based and less a matter of internal rivalry and manipulation.
In one of her more remarkable assessments of late, Lo said the Control Yuan should take action against Ma if he had broken the law while mayor of Taipei. Lo was referring to Ma’s permitting the construction of a 23-story building close to the presidential residence despite potential security risks. (That remark, however, did highlight a poor understanding of the law on Lo’s part, as the Control Yuan cannot censure the president.)
Earlier this month, Lo also said that costly, portable satellite equipment that should be used during typhoon season had not been deployed this summer because of a lack of trained operators. That compelled Minister of the Interior Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) to rebut the claims, which had hit a sore spot after outrage over the mishandling of Morakot relief efforts forced a Cabinet reshuffle.
The proposal targeting Lo submitted on Sunday followed a signature drive launched by KMT youth delegates calling on her to resign over her open criticism of the government. The delegates said Lo should not go public with opinions that make the Ma administration or the party look bad. The message is, essentially: Fight behind closed doors and present a united front to the public.
But these delegates are overlooking the value of public debate, which could put pressure on the administration to answer criticism it could otherwise ignore. Lo’s arguments may also appeal to voters unhappy with the policies of the Ma administration but not opposed to the party on all matters. Considering the consistently low public support ratings for this administration, the KMT stands to benefit from showing a plurality of opinion.
As members aspiring to join the next generation of KMT leadership, the attitude of these youth delegates is discouraging. They do not indicate a growing appreciation for open debate within the KMT’s younger ranks, and that is cause for concern.
“Is the party going to control freedom of speech?” Lo asked on Sunday.
In the case of a critical voice like Lo’s, it may want to. But the KMT should also be aware that shooting down critics within the party will project not an image of unity, but of intolerance. That would strengthen the concerns of the KMT’s critics outside the party, who warn that its professed support for democracy is a charade.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS