It is getting harder each day for US President Barack Obama to maintain the illusion of progress in Middle East peacemaking. The UN human rights council’s vote to condemn January’s Israeli assault on Gaza, furiously rejected by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over the weekend, was the latest blow to US efforts to start negotiations on a two-state solution.
Across the region, all the signs point not to reconciliation, but to renewed confrontation. As Washington talks about talks, the Arab world mutters ominously about the prospect of a third intifada.
Obama’s special Middle East envoy George Mitchell will keep up appearances by holding more meetings with Palestinian officials in Washington tomorrow. US ambassador to the UN Susan Rice will visit Israel and the occupied territories this week. After his embarrassingly unproductive summit with Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in New York last month, Obama instructed Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to deliver a progress report by the middle of this month. They are expected to meet after Mitchell’s latest talks. But what can she tell him?
On the Palestinian side, attitudes are hardening as high hopes engendered by Obama’s promise of a brave new dawn fade. Abbas is probably politically weaker now than at any time since becoming president. Fatah officials admit his decision, under US pressure, to delay action on the UN human rights report on Israel’s invasion of Gaza was disastrous. Although Abbas later reversed his position, his misjudgment was a gift for Hamas and other opponents, who argue he is out of touch and dismiss him as a “collaborator.”
In a defiant television address, and during a rare visit to Jenin last week, Abbas denied the charges while appearing to distance himself from US mediation efforts. He called on Mitchell to enforce Washington’s initial demand that Israel end all construction in Jewish settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, a demand that was bluntly rejected by Netanyahu and has subsequently been de-emphasized by Obama. Abbas said recent clashes near the al-Aqsa mosque were a response to an Israeli effort to “erase the Arab and Muslim identity of Jerusalem.” He suggested the Palestinians might increasingly look to the UN and other international bodies to advance their cause.
Egyptian efforts to reconcile the rival Palestinian factions appear, meanwhile, to have stalled, partly due to US meddling. Officials in Cairo say the signing of an outline co-operation agreement between Fatah and Hamas, due on Sunday, has been postponed indefinitely. One reason is the row over the UN report. Another, according to the Israel’s Haaretz newspaper was a US veto. It said Mitchell had told Egypt that the proposed deal would harm the peace process. His objection appears rooted in the US and Israel’s ideological refusal to deal, however loosely, with Hamas.
Hardliners on both sides are exploiting the deepening stalemate. In Damascus, Hamas leader Khaled Meshal said it was time for all Arab states to renew their drive for the “liberation” of Palestine “from the sea to the river” (meaning the destruction of Israel). Avigdor Lieberman, the hawkish Israeli foreign minister, has taken to repeating his view that peace is years way.
More moderate figures, such as King Abdullah of Jordan, are expressing growing pessimism.
“We’re sliding back into the darkness,” he said recently. “We are seeing problems in Jerusalem that will directly destabilize not only the relationship with Jordan ... but will also create a tinderbox that will have a major flashpoint throughout the Islamic world.” Turkey, one of Israel’s few friends in the Middle East, has also fallen out with Netanyahu over Gaza and related frustrations.
If Clinton is frank with Obama, she will tell him that Netanyahu, while insisting he is ready in theory to negotiate a two-state solution, is adopting an ever more inflexible line in practice. Addressing the Knesset last week, the Israeli leader ignored the settlements issue — a key US concern — and reasserted that Palestinians must recognize Israel as a Jewish state if they want a state of their own. After Friday’s vote in Geneva, he is claiming the UN wants nothing less than the “de-legitimization” of Israel and is encouraging global terrorism. These are extreme and confrontational positions.
There can be little doubt that his confidence stems from the perception that after a tense few months, he has “seen off” Obama and his naive peacemaking notions. US diplomats warn that Obama is “a man of steel,” and will not give up. This bold assertion is about to be tested.
Chinese Ministry of National Defense spokesman Wu Qian (吳謙) announced at a news conference that General Miao Hua (苗華) — director of the Political Work Department of the Central Military Commission — has been suspended from his duties pending an investigation of serious disciplinary breaches. Miao’s role within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) affects not only its loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), but also ideological control. This reflects the PLA’s complex internal power struggles, as well as its long-existing structural problems. Since its establishment, the PLA has emphasized that “the party commands the gun,” and that the military is
US president-elect Donald Trump continues to make nominations for his Cabinet and US agencies, with most of his picks being staunchly against Beijing. For US ambassador to China, Trump has tapped former US senator David Perdue. This appointment makes it crystal clear that Trump has no intention of letting China continue to steal from the US while infiltrating it in a surreptitious quasi-war, harming world peace and stability. Originally earning a name for himself in the business world, Perdue made his start with Chinese supply chains as a manager for several US firms. He later served as the CEO of Reebok and
Since the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation has taken Taiwanese students to visit China and invited Chinese students to Taiwan. Ma calls those activities “cross-strait exchanges,” yet the trips completely avoid topics prohibited by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), such as democracy, freedom and human rights — all of which are universal values. During the foundation’s most recent Chinese student tour group, a Fudan University student used terms such as “China, Taipei” and “the motherland” when discussing Taiwan’s recent baseball victory. The group’s visit to Zhongshan Girls’ High School also received prominent coverage in
India and China have taken a significant step toward disengagement of their military troops after reaching an agreement on the long-standing disputes in the Galwan Valley. For government officials and policy experts, this move is welcome, signaling the potential resolution of the enduring border issues between the two countries. However, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of this disengagement on India’s relationship with Taiwan. Over the past few years, there have been important developments in India-Taiwan relations, including exchanges between heads of state soon after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s third electoral victory. This raises the pressing question: