Money. The stuff that makes the world go round. Every day we earn it, spend it, exchange it and lose it. But you won’t find any Linden dollars, Eve ISK or Facebook credits down the back of the couch.
Virtual currencies like these are used for transactions in online worlds and social networking sites. While real-world currencies are on the slide, many virtual ones are going from strength to strength. In the second quarter of the year the equivalent of US$144 million was traded on the LindeX, the official currency exchange of Second Life, where residents buy and sell Linden dollars for their US counterpart — a 20 percent increase on the previous quarter, while the US economy shrank by 1 percent. Trading activity increased by 6 percent in the last quarter of last year.
“New ideas about money are beginning to evolve,” said Dave Birch, a director of Consult Hyperion, a management consultancy that specializes in electronic transactions. “You’d have a tough job convincing me that the pound [Sterling] is any more ‘real’ than World of Warcraft gold. Where is your starting point? The UK hasn’t had a gold standard for the past three generations,” Birch said.
It’s not the first time that virtual currencies have been mooted as the future of online payments. Several were launched in the late 1990s; but the likes of Beenz and Flooz were doomed to failure, suffering fraud and lack of consumer interest.
Lisa Rutherford, president of Twofish, which manages virtual economies for social, gaming and entertainment services, says the online landscape has changed.
“If you’ve going to do a large-scale universal currency, you need to have a certain level of scale, and it needs to be serving a certain purpose. That’s really what the fundamental shift has been,” she said.
Large-scale multiplayer online games have long featured complex virtual economies where players can purchase items and skills for their avatars. In Second Life, US dollars can be converted into Linden dollars and vice versa through channels in the virtual environment. Eve Online, however, operates a closed system: ISK brought by the player can only be used in the virtual environment, and conversion into real-world currency is prohibited.
Users caught breaching the rules are banned, but a black market has developed nonetheless; a Google search for “Eve ISK” lists hundreds of Web sites selling it along with other virtual currencies.
Eve Online’s economy is now more or less player driven, says Eyjolfur Guemundsson, an economist who works for Eve Online’s developer, CCP.
“It is simply monitored by us just like any other economy in the real world is by a central bank, finance minister or national economic institute,” she said.
Without careful oversight, cash can accumulate in the system, causing inflation. Linden Lab uses several controls to keep the exchange rate in Second Life relatively stable at about 265 to the US dollar. These include the pricing and promotion of various “sinks”, such as the cost of uploading content or posting classified ads, which remove currency from circulation. The volume of new Linden dollars available for purchase can also be adjusted.
Second Life’s European residents pay VAT (purchase tax) on some purchases in order to comply with EU tax regulations, and virtual economies could also be subject to further taxation in future.
“The controversy is whether taxable income is in fact created at the point when you obtain the virtual assets,” says Vili Lehdonvirta, a researcher at Helsinki Institute for Information Technology.
Despite careful oversight, even virtual worlds are not immune to financial chicanery. Allegations of a massive theft recently started a run on EBANK, which handled deposits in Eve Online’s ISK currency. One of the bank’s founders was accused of stealing about 250 billion ISK, exchanging it for £3,115.
Lehdonvirta expects to see further regulation of virtual banking.
“This is the direction it needs to go in the future if these virtual currencies are to be used as a serious platform for commerce,” he said.
While some entrepreneurs keep a significant balance in their virtual accounts, most people have a relatively small amount stored online.
“For example, while Second Life residents hold roughly US$25 million in Linden dollars, this is spread across millions of accounts,” said Tom Hale, chief product officer at Linden Lab.
By comparison, China has taken to virtual currencies in a big way. Last year nearly US$2 billion of virtual money changed hands in the country, according to the China Internet Network Information Center. Most virtual currency is spent on virtual items, but Chinese consumers also use it to purchase physical goods and services — a practice the Chinese government recently clamped down on.
Social networks have also launched their own currencies. Facebook credits can be used to buy virtual gifts — such as cupcakes, toys and flowers — from the Facebook Gift Shop. Select developers may soon be able to incorporate Facebook credits into their games and applications, with Facebook getting a cut of the profits. Business Week recently reported that Zynga, creators of the Mafia Wars Facebook game, could make US$100 million from its virtual offerings this year, mostly from Facebook sales.
Startups such as Jambool and Spare Change have launched virtual currencies that are interoperable across a range of games, applications and social networks, but Twofish’s Rutherford believes only a company of Facebook’s size can deliver the “brand promise” that would give a universal currency widespread appeal. Hale thinks that eventually there will be “a few dominant virtual currencies that by dint of their size become exchange currencies, just as the US dollar is to the global economy today”.
With faith in real-world currencies shaken by the financial crisis, perhaps virtual ones will find a more receptive mainstream audience in future.
The US Department of Defense recently released this year’s “Report on Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China.” This annual report provides a comprehensive overview of China’s military capabilities, strategic objectives and evolving global ambitions. Taiwan features prominently in this year’s report, as capturing the nation remains central to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) vision of the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation,” a goal he has set for 2049. The report underscores Taiwan’s critical role in China’s long-term strategy, highlighting its significance as a geopolitical flashpoint and a key target in China’s quest to assert dominance
The National Development Council (NDC) on Wednesday last week launched a six-month “digital nomad visitor visa” program, the Central News Agency (CNA) reported on Monday. The new visa is for foreign nationals from Taiwan’s list of visa-exempt countries who meet financial eligibility criteria and provide proof of work contracts, but it is not clear how it differs from other visitor visas for nationals of those countries, CNA wrote. The NDC last year said that it hoped to attract 100,000 “digital nomads,” according to the report. Interest in working remotely from abroad has significantly increased in recent years following improvements in
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
RSS