Now you see them ...
Dear Johnny,
Lately, I have seen flags flying all about the city and I smile. Then I remember that this means there are no “particular” Chinese officials in town, or something like that.
I really hope that those flags can stay all year round, because I love this country. However, I have no doubt — prove me wrong, President Ma — that the flags will disappear come the right time. Yes, that Chen [Yunlin, 陳雲林] guy!
Taking down your national flag when foreigners are in town is so degrading. This nonsense has got to stop.
HARRY ADAMOPOULOS
Taipei
Johnny replies: Yes, but who is going to stop it? You could name any number of symbolic insults that will accompany the arrival of Chicom negotiators, but the only people who will object at this time are dyed-in-the-wool activists with little practical support from ordinary people. And even a lot of these people are not prepared to get into trouble by making a powerful statement of resistance.
Mark my words. The moment the ordinary person’s hip pocket starts emptying over Chinese trade deals, the climate will change. If they know what’s good for them, activists will be carefully preparing for that moment.
In the meantime, what are you, as a person most locals would regard as a foreigner, willing and able to do, other than write letters to me?
BBC smackdown, please
Dear Johnny,
I just read the letter entitled “BBC on the ‘offensive’” (Johnny Neihu’s Mailbag, Oct. 10, page 8) on longtime resident Michael’s disappointment with the BBC. But the BBC’s reply wasn’t as good as your reading of it made it out to be.
Here’s something I wrote on the Taiwan Matters blog about one “white terror” (sic) story by the Beeb: taiwanmatters.blogspot.com/2008/07/sorry-ass-bbc-misreports-taiwan-again.html.
In it I cover the many unforgivable errors and insults made by writer Caroline Gluck and the BBC, and I link to 11 earlier critiques — from just the two previous years — written by myself and fellow blogger Michael Turton on the BBC’s inaccurate and downright dishonest reporting on Taiwan.
There is a pattern here. I don’t think that the BBC can be “educated” because everything I see tells me that it’s on purpose. Please give the BBC the verbal smackdown they deserve.
TIM MADDOG
Taichung
Johnny replies: No matter how sloppy the BBC reports may be, this style of reporting is not unique to Taiwan coverage and their reports no doubt enrage activists around the world. For now, my challenge to you is this: Explain why the BBC would be “dishonest.”
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS