Now you see them ...
Dear Johnny,
Lately, I have seen flags flying all about the city and I smile. Then I remember that this means there are no “particular” Chinese officials in town, or something like that.
I really hope that those flags can stay all year round, because I love this country. However, I have no doubt — prove me wrong, President Ma — that the flags will disappear come the right time. Yes, that Chen [Yunlin, 陳雲林] guy!
Taking down your national flag when foreigners are in town is so degrading. This nonsense has got to stop.
HARRY ADAMOPOULOS
Taipei
Johnny replies: Yes, but who is going to stop it? You could name any number of symbolic insults that will accompany the arrival of Chicom negotiators, but the only people who will object at this time are dyed-in-the-wool activists with little practical support from ordinary people. And even a lot of these people are not prepared to get into trouble by making a powerful statement of resistance.
Mark my words. The moment the ordinary person’s hip pocket starts emptying over Chinese trade deals, the climate will change. If they know what’s good for them, activists will be carefully preparing for that moment.
In the meantime, what are you, as a person most locals would regard as a foreigner, willing and able to do, other than write letters to me?
BBC smackdown, please
Dear Johnny,
I just read the letter entitled “BBC on the ‘offensive’” (Johnny Neihu’s Mailbag, Oct. 10, page 8) on longtime resident Michael’s disappointment with the BBC. But the BBC’s reply wasn’t as good as your reading of it made it out to be.
Here’s something I wrote on the Taiwan Matters blog about one “white terror” (sic) story by the Beeb: taiwanmatters.blogspot.com/2008/07/sorry-ass-bbc-misreports-taiwan-again.html.
In it I cover the many unforgivable errors and insults made by writer Caroline Gluck and the BBC, and I link to 11 earlier critiques — from just the two previous years — written by myself and fellow blogger Michael Turton on the BBC’s inaccurate and downright dishonest reporting on Taiwan.
There is a pattern here. I don’t think that the BBC can be “educated” because everything I see tells me that it’s on purpose. Please give the BBC the verbal smackdown they deserve.
TIM MADDOG
Taichung
Johnny replies: No matter how sloppy the BBC reports may be, this style of reporting is not unique to Taiwan coverage and their reports no doubt enrage activists around the world. For now, my challenge to you is this: Explain why the BBC would be “dishonest.”
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS