For obvious reasons, all eyes have been on the Control Yuan’s review of the government’s response to Typhoon Morakot. Soon after the typhoon hit Taiwan and the devastation in the south became apparent, Control Yuan President Wang Chien-shien (王建煊) reacted to the government’s incompetent response with the classic line: “I was so angry that I wanted to scold and kill people, but I didn’t know who to blame.”
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) did, however. His first public criticism was directed at the Central Weather Bureau (CWB). Someone or something had to be immediately accountable, and the easiest target was a bunch of civil-service meteorologists with no opportunity to defend their organization or their individual professionalism.
Wang, meanwhile, was able to compose himself and be more specific: “The Control Yuan will impeach the heads of government institutions who failed to improve the problems highlighted by the Control Yuan’s corrective measures.”
And this: “The Control Yuan is entitled to impeach heads of government agencies repeatedly until they step down, and to keep impeaching their successors until problems are resolved.”
Fine words, but judging from the Control Yuan report on the CWB’s handling of Morakot this week, it is not certain that those who acted negligently or incompetently will be identified. Worse, it is possible that scapegoating will be an acceptable substitute.
Try as it might, the Control Yuan report made no meaningful comment on professional aspects of weather forecasting — in particular, how to determine the volume of rainfall likely to hit specific locations that might lead to fatalities. The CWB cannot be held to account for natural phenomena for which no scientific technique offers reliable predictive assistance. Besides, the CWB is made up of meteorologists, not geologists — and certainly not soothsayers.
The Control Yuan’s corrective measures in some cases were laughable, including the quaint idea of a drain-cleaning reminder service for those who need such advice. Clearly, its investigators must adopt a more intelligent approach.
At a press conference on Wednesday, Control Yuan member Cheng Jen-hung (程仁宏) actually offered praise to CWB staff for their meteorological aptitude, but said they have poor public relations skills.
Cheng, who rode into the Control Yuan on the back of his leadership of the Consumers’ Foundation — a media-savvy organization that conducts unscientific “surveys” of consumer products and issues doom-ridden press releases — has, for one, carried over his hobby-horse approach to government accountability by focusing on insubstantial matters. No one should be surprised by this; Cheng, after all, once warned that the High Speed Rail was at risk of derailing, but we still don’t know why.
If an official culture of excessive blame and activist meddling continues, what public confidence that remains in the Control Yuan will sour and political influence could act as the casting vote where profitable.
Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) may have detected the danger in this, not to mention the gross injustice. On Thursday last week, he made special mention of Daniel Wu (吳德榮), a senior forecaster and head of the CWB’s forecast center who retired early after its pitiful treatment at the hands of the president.
The premier said: “Launching attacks on civil servants who are faithful to their duties and perform well, sapping their morale, will negatively influence the growth of society and impede the nation’s progress. Civil servants should be appraised justly.”
Hear, hear. If only the Control Yuan, and the president, understood why.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS