News that New Tang Dynasty TV (NTDTV, 新唐人電視台) broadcasts by carrier Chunghwa Telecom experienced a series of blackouts last month could be the most disturbing and direct effort yet on the part of Beijing to censor the flow of information in Taiwan.
The station reported a series of interruptions to its broadcasts in the run-up to the 60th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China and a complete blackout on the day of the anniversary last Thursday.
Chunghwa Telecom is attempting to locate the cause of the problem and the National Communications Commission (NCC) has launched an investigation. Democratic Progressive Party Legislator William Lai (賴清德), meanwhile, expressed concern that Beijing was the culprit.
There are a number of reasons to suspect that China is involved. Chunghwa said it has been unable to identify any technical problems with its broadcasting equipment. Moreover, the timing of the blackout would have been a symbolic victory for Chinese authorities, which have long waged a campaign against the TV station. Beijing resents NTDTV’s strong focus on the persecution of Falun Gong in China and its steady stream of coverage on other human rights abuses there.
This would not be the first time that meddling by China has affected the station’s operations, but if Beijing is behind these latest problems, it would be a warning to anyone who believes China does not seek to curb free speech in Taiwan.
Only recently, Kaohsiung’s rescheduling of a documentary about Uighur activist Rebiya Kadeer, followed shortly after by the government’s refusal to grant her a visa to visit in December, raised concerns that Chinese pressure was disrupting human-rights-related events beyond its borders.
Taiwanese lawmakers have taken a clear stand on NTDTV’s right to broadcast before and should do so again. In 2005, dozens of legislators (along with their counterparts in the US, Canada and Europe) expressed concern that Chinese pressure had stopped a French company from renewing a contract with NTDTV. The contract with Eutelsat had allowed NTDTV to broadcast into China, evading Beijing’s tight control on information.
Eutelsat later re-signed with NTDTV, but last year, NTDTV’s transmission into China stopped as transmissions in other parts of the world continued. Eutelsat cited “technical problems,” but last year Reporters Without Borders released evidence — in the form of a taped recording of a Eutelsat employee — indicating that Eutelsat had cut the transmission to appease Beijing. The International Federation of Journalists and the European Parliament expressed concern about the reasons for the disruption.
While it is commendable that the NCC is probing broadcast disruptions in Taiwan, Chunghwa Telecom has said it would be difficult to link the source of the disruptions to China. Nevertheless, every effort must be made to identify the cause.
If Beijing was behind the blackout on Thursday, it would indicate that China is not concerned with a potential backlash in Taiwan, whether it be in the form of a rebuke by lawmakers or the government, or even a public outcry.
Ironically, it is precisely this arrogance and aggression on the part of Beijing that reminds the public of the value of free speech — and of Beijing’s malice toward Taiwan’s freedoms. In this context, and if Beijing indeed was involved, this “triumph” over NTDTV would amount to little.
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS