Don’t appease China
If China would leave Taiwan alone, the Taiwanese would never choose to go to war with China.
The problem is, for Taiwan today, there is no choice between peace and war. Peace is not the absence of war, but the presence of justice.
China taking over Taiwan would rob it of peace, democracy and human rights. China taking Taiwan would be an injustice that begets more injustice.
So the choice is between slavery or fighting for freedom — today through non-military means, but perhaps one day with weapons of war.
Unfortunately, many in Taiwan have deluded themselves into thinking that being annexed by China would be better than fighting for freedom. People from many other countries share the same delusion about China and Taiwan.
The late British prime minister Neville Chamberlain had similar delusions about Nazi Germany.
Allowing China to annex Taiwan would lead to more war in the future, with China’s aggressive expansionism, militant nationalism and Leninist imperialism felt by other neighboring countries — and not just ones on the border.
Furthermore, other brutish authoritarian regimes would be emboldened by the lack of consequences over China’s actions. Many other wars would be started by these regimes.
NAME WITHHELD
Animals have rights, too
Nestled in hills of lush greenery and surrounded by pineapple and sugarcane fields, the rustic college campus where I work offers a wonderful learning environment. Before the semester began, while strolling down the pink brick road, I saw a three-legged yellow dog — whom I called “Charlie” — skinny as a rail and looking hungry. I fed him my red bean pastry.
Another day, as I rode my bicycle to school, Suzuki, another stray dog, followed me all the way to my office in hopes of a bit of food. He was hungry enough to follow me about 1km. As I walked to my office, Fluffy, a white and orange cat, was scrounging through trash for leftovers.
The campus is bustling now with students and the Student Activity Center is packed with freshmen. The start of the school year affects the welfare of these stray dogs and cats.
One day I came across Charlie, wobbling along the road. He looked well-fed and content. Obviously he is in the good hands of some young students. Later, I saw one young woman brushing the hair of another stray and playing with him.
Suzuki no longer follows me — there is enough food from kind-hearted students. He even turned down my offer of a doughnut the other day.
Fluffy no longer whines from hunger and is rarely seen at garbage bins.
Education, at least at this campus, may play a role in making the younger generation more conscientious about the welfare of animals.
Such empathy on the part of the students speaks volumes about the success of civic education.
Of course, there is still much to be done to improve the treatment of animals in Taiwan when compared with the excellent treatment of pets in the US and other developed countries: better access to veterinarians, requirements for shots and the promotion of neutering and spaying to control the pet population.
There is no denying that more must be done to control the population of stray dogs and cats in Taiwan.
However, the fate of these animals is much worse in other Asian counties. We must object strongly to the eating of cats and dogs in some countries.
From a humanitarian point of view, we must respect the right to life for humans and animals alike. I tip my hat to the students on this campus who care about animal suffering and actually do something about it.
YANG CHIN-WEI
Chiayi
Stop focusing on China alone
With a tsunami in Samoa, an earthquake in Indonesia and typhoons and flooding in the Philippines, Taiwan’s government and humanitarian organizations should help out.
Taiwan is the Austronesian homeland of Hawaiiki and could be a leader in the Pacific and Indian Oceans. Taiwan has the resources and ability. Taiwan should stop focusing on China alone and look out toward the world.
JOEL LINTON
Taipei
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS