Don’t appease China
If China would leave Taiwan alone, the Taiwanese would never choose to go to war with China.
The problem is, for Taiwan today, there is no choice between peace and war. Peace is not the absence of war, but the presence of justice.
China taking over Taiwan would rob it of peace, democracy and human rights. China taking Taiwan would be an injustice that begets more injustice.
So the choice is between slavery or fighting for freedom — today through non-military means, but perhaps one day with weapons of war.
Unfortunately, many in Taiwan have deluded themselves into thinking that being annexed by China would be better than fighting for freedom. People from many other countries share the same delusion about China and Taiwan.
The late British prime minister Neville Chamberlain had similar delusions about Nazi Germany.
Allowing China to annex Taiwan would lead to more war in the future, with China’s aggressive expansionism, militant nationalism and Leninist imperialism felt by other neighboring countries — and not just ones on the border.
Furthermore, other brutish authoritarian regimes would be emboldened by the lack of consequences over China’s actions. Many other wars would be started by these regimes.
NAME WITHHELD
Animals have rights, too
Nestled in hills of lush greenery and surrounded by pineapple and sugarcane fields, the rustic college campus where I work offers a wonderful learning environment. Before the semester began, while strolling down the pink brick road, I saw a three-legged yellow dog — whom I called “Charlie” — skinny as a rail and looking hungry. I fed him my red bean pastry.
Another day, as I rode my bicycle to school, Suzuki, another stray dog, followed me all the way to my office in hopes of a bit of food. He was hungry enough to follow me about 1km. As I walked to my office, Fluffy, a white and orange cat, was scrounging through trash for leftovers.
The campus is bustling now with students and the Student Activity Center is packed with freshmen. The start of the school year affects the welfare of these stray dogs and cats.
One day I came across Charlie, wobbling along the road. He looked well-fed and content. Obviously he is in the good hands of some young students. Later, I saw one young woman brushing the hair of another stray and playing with him.
Suzuki no longer follows me — there is enough food from kind-hearted students. He even turned down my offer of a doughnut the other day.
Fluffy no longer whines from hunger and is rarely seen at garbage bins.
Education, at least at this campus, may play a role in making the younger generation more conscientious about the welfare of animals.
Such empathy on the part of the students speaks volumes about the success of civic education.
Of course, there is still much to be done to improve the treatment of animals in Taiwan when compared with the excellent treatment of pets in the US and other developed countries: better access to veterinarians, requirements for shots and the promotion of neutering and spaying to control the pet population.
There is no denying that more must be done to control the population of stray dogs and cats in Taiwan.
However, the fate of these animals is much worse in other Asian counties. We must object strongly to the eating of cats and dogs in some countries.
From a humanitarian point of view, we must respect the right to life for humans and animals alike. I tip my hat to the students on this campus who care about animal suffering and actually do something about it.
YANG CHIN-WEI
Chiayi
Stop focusing on China alone
With a tsunami in Samoa, an earthquake in Indonesia and typhoons and flooding in the Philippines, Taiwan’s government and humanitarian organizations should help out.
Taiwan is the Austronesian homeland of Hawaiiki and could be a leader in the Pacific and Indian Oceans. Taiwan has the resources and ability. Taiwan should stop focusing on China alone and look out toward the world.
JOEL LINTON
Taipei
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS