Though today is the 23rd anniversary of the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) founding, no one was in the mood to celebrate following the rejection of former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) latest appeal. But party morale vastly improved with the DPP victory in Yunlin County’s legislative by-election and the rejection of a Penghu referendum on opening casinos there.
Both votes were politically significant and could indicate that the DPP is leaving the problems of the Chen era behind.
The allegations against Chen have cost the DPP dearly in elections. This has strengthened Ma, who led the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to undisputed power. He, meanwhile, will soon take up the KMT chairmanship. But the aftermath of Typhoon Morakot has ravaged Ma’s reputation. Both parties are now at a crossroads that could lead either to strength or decline.
The Yunlin result gives the DPP its 28th legislative seat and the power to initiate impeachment proceedings against the president. Although this does not mean the DPP could successfully recall him, the change strengthens the legislature’s supervisory power. The government can no longer ignore the public as it pursues an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China.
The DPP has always relied on party unity to fight a divided KMT. Liu Chien-kuo (劉建國) not only won Yunlin’s legislative seat, he broke Yunlin’s tradition of elections controlled by organized crime, money and factions. The fact that candidates campaigned wearing bulletproof vests and supporters of candidates were arrested buying votes is an insult to the county. Voters used their ballots to show they have had enough.
Liu has the support of Yunlin County Commissioner Su Chih-fen (蘇治芬) of the DPP. The KMT’s hopes of regaining the commissioner’s seat in the year-end elections with the help of Chang Jung-wei (張榮味) and his faction — long influential in Yunlin — are now looking dim.
The KMT had hoped to win in Yunlin and go on to breach the DPP’s “Jhuoshui River defense line” in the December elections. But with the government performing poorly and its local power base split into factions, it stood no chance in Yunlin — and the defeat could signal a threat to the party’s control of areas north of the Jhuoshui River.
In Penghu, the proposal to set up casinos was supported by the KMT-controlled county government. The party used its legislative majority to pass the Isolated Islands Construction Act (離島建設條例), which sought to dodge the Referendum Act (公民投票法) and would have allowed the casino referendum to pass if it won the majority of votes cast rather than the majority of votes of all eligible voters.
The KMT lost its decade-long bid to allow gambling in Penghu — even with local and central government forces acting in concert.
The proposal was depicted as a blank check that would bring wealth to the islands, but the KMT failed to answer concerns about the negative social effects of gambling. In rejecting the proposal, Penghu residents voted for their values. The KMT didn’t just lose a referendum, it lost the moral high ground.
The by-election and referendum results indicate that Ma can no longer count on the Chen case to undermine support for the DPP. To avoid a major loss in the year-end elections, Ma will have to concentrate on winning back public support.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS