A laughable verdict
Any reader with some sense likely finds himself or herself unable to suppress the urge to laugh while perusing the transcript of Judge Tsai Shou-hsun’s (蔡守訓) verdicts on former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and his associates with respect to the charges of graft.
Its language is asinine and bombastic, its legal references to Song Dynasty imperial maxims are anachronistic and its tone is at once paltry and narcissistic. Honestly, Judge Tsai, pray enlighten us as to what an emperor of the past Chinese dynasty said in any way has got to do with the heart of the matter of the case.
We would also like to know if attending National Taiwan University merits a harsher penalty for two of the defendants.
We have been given to understand that the transcript will be translated into English and French and then given to the Swiss authorities as a legal basis to claim Chen’s frozen assets in Swiss financial institutions. We shudder to think of the giggling that the transcript may induce when the appropriate Swiss authorities read it. The chance of recovering Chen’s assets will be even less likely as a result.
Much energy and revenue have been wasted on a masterpiece of legal trash. Its legality was pronounced dead the moment President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration helped Tsai hijack the case — a miscalculated measure that many in the pan-blue camp are sorely repenting at this moment.
This has certainly deferred Ma’s goal of putting Chen through a “horrible death.” But Ma is tenacious and good at improvisation. His hangers-on and jackals will continue to provide service to help him achieve his objective. Tsai is just one of the expedients in the grand scheme of this political fiasco.
YANG CHUNHUI
Salt Lake City, Utah
Monitor Internet security
Using the Internet to buy books or getting an online membership to read articles is very common in Taiwan. A report published by Taiwan Network Information Center said the nation’s Internet penetration rate reached 68.94 percent last year. We can expect that more people went online this year.
When we use Internet for online auctions, to join airline frequent flier clubs or read articles, we have to register to become a member first. However, this simple action could lead to trouble.
The average person might sign up on one or two Web sites a month without thinking much about the Web site’s security. To sign up we usually have to provide personal details such as name, birth date, e-mail address and phone number and then provide a user ID and password settings. The Web site registration process is as simple, but this simplicity does not guarantee the information we provide is safe and will not be manipulated by malicious technicians or hackers.
Suppose I Google an interesting article and link to the URL, the Web site requires me to sign up to read the entire article. Usually, we will follow the steps the Web site requests in order to read the intriguing content. The problem is, how many sets of password and user IDs can we actually remember? I am afraid that the answer for most of us is “few.” We seldom memorize different passwords and user IDs for different uses. Many online surfers use the same password they used for their ATM cards or online bank accounts.
Once in a blue moon, I receive e-mails from high school buddies or cyberpals. Suddenly it seems that they have become perverts, sending me lots of pornography links or they change their career to be a pimp by inviting me to visit their business. These poor friends, they still have no idea what’s going on. They have become victims of Internet fraud. Then there are the hackers who use your best friend’s e-mail account to ask you to transfer a couple thousand dollars to help with some emergency.
If we remain unaware or ignore how serious Internet crime is, we might become the next target for those scammers. The best way to prevent this is to update our password every 72 days and separate two sets of password for use on insignificant and important Web sites respectively.
The police should also do more to prevent Internet crime. Legislators should pass laws to catch up with the fast-changing online world. If Internet users take precautions and with help from our government, I believe that we can have a safer Web environment in the near future.
JACK HUANG
Lugang, Changhua County
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS