Many aspects of the government’s handling of the Formosa Chieftain 2 sports fishing boat incident are praiseworthy, but now that the vessel has been impounded by Japanese authorities, other aspects require careful thought before action is taken.
In terms of maritime law, most worrying is the likelihood that the boat and crew were taken by the Japanese west of the temporary enforcement line between Japan and Taiwan — that is, in Taiwanese waters. It’s akin to a Taiwanese accused of a crime overseas returning home, only to be detained by foreign authorities and taken out of the country without the knowledge of the Taiwanese government.
In 1961, when the British trawler Red Crusader was fishing illegally near the Faroe Islands, the crew of the Danish frigate Niels Ebbessen boarded the trawler to guide it to port, but the Red Crusader continued toward Aberdeen, hurriedly leaving Danish waters with the Niels Ebbessen in pursuit.
The British warship Troubridge came to the trawler’s assistance and placed itself between the two boats, blocking the Danish ship on the high seas while the trawler made its way to Aberdeen.
Denmark said the British warship offered illegal protection, but after the two parties submitted the issue to a neutral commission, no fault was found with the British.
A similar incident involving Japan and South Korea in 2005 highlighted the importance of returning boats and crew to their home country in dealing with maritime disputes.
A South Korean fishing boat was fishing illegally inside Japan’s exclusive economic zone when two Japanese law enforcement officials boarded the boat to investigate. The boat’s captain detained the officials and sailed toward South Korean waters.
After the boat entered the South Korean exclusive economic zone, a stand-off developed between six Japanese and five South Korean vessels, with Japan insisting that the South Korean captain and the boat be returned to its custody.
An agreement was eventually reached, with the South Korean side agreeing to pay a bond and guaranteeing that the incident would be properly investigated in accordance with maritime law.
The Japanese vessels then left and the South Korean fishing boat and crew returned to port for investigation and punishment.
By maritime convention, crews and boats are not extradited, but in the case of the Formosa Chieftain 2, the vessel and crew remain stuck in Japan — a worrying set of circumstances. Worse still, the incident occurred in contested waters and this could have an impact on maritime talks.
Taiwan announced the location of the temporary enforcement line in 2003, but this is the first time that Japan has encroached west of the line to detain Taiwanese fishermen, and even after engaging Taiwan’s coast guard.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has a deep understanding of international law. Top officials must make clear to the foreign ministry and its agencies that they must protest against Japan’s arrest of Taiwanese crew and its confiscation of a Taiwanese boat in waters west of the enforcement line in order to ensure that this incident does not set a precedent.
Punishment must also be meted out to the crew by a Taiwanese court if the law has been broken.
Illegal conduct on the part of Taiwanese boats must not be indulged, otherwise the ability of ordinary fishermen to do their job could be compromised by cross-border tensions.
Irresponsible behavior encourages fishermen to act as they wish.
If they end up thinking that they have the government’s support in breaking the law, then Taiwan’s relations with Japan could deteriorate
Finally, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Coast Guard Administration should be informed that it is unacceptable for Japan to seize vessels and crew and that this conduct challenges Taiwan’s territorial claims.
Allowing Japan to have a free hand would make an already difficult situation even more difficult.
Chiang Huang-chih is an associate professor at National Taiwan University’s College of Law.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
A return to power for former US president Donald Trump would pose grave risks to Taiwan’s security, autonomy and the broader stability of the Indo-Pacific region. The stakes have never been higher as China aggressively escalates its pressure on Taiwan, deploying economic, military and psychological tactics aimed at subjugating the nation under Beijing’s control. The US has long acted as Taiwan’s foremost security partner, a bulwark against Chinese expansionism in the region. However, a second Trump presidency could upend decades of US commitments, introducing unpredictability that could embolden Beijing and severely compromise Taiwan’s position. While president, Trump’s foreign policy reflected a transactional
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
RSS