A subtle change in attitude by the Ministry of Economic Affairs last week over the speed with which the government has sought to sign an economic pact with China highlights the fact that the public retain the right to change government policy priorities — a reality that Typhoon Morakot brought to light.
On Thursday, during his first meeting with department heads as minister of economic affairs, Shih Yen-shiang (施顏祥) instructed the ministry’s Office of Trade Negotiations to lobby Taiwan’s major trading partners — Singapore, Japan and the US — for free-trade agreement (FTA) negotiations.
Chinese-language newspapers quoted Shih as saying it was “equally important” to sign FTAs with other countries and ink an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China. He also asked officials for a plan to monitor and evaluate progress.
This was not the first time that the ministry had spoken openly about the importance of FTAs with countries other than China. But ever since it joined the WTO as an independent entity in January 2001, Taiwan has only signed FTAs with five Central American countries: Panama, Guatemala, Nicaragua, El Salvador and Honduras.
Still, the ministry’s renewed interest in FTA talks — despite President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) focus on signing an ECFA early next year — is a sign that the government has adjusted its priorities out of pragmatism and in response to domestic pressure.
Indeed, it is remarkable how little progress the government has made in securing public support for an ECFA. In recent months, concerns about the pact’s impact on the national interest have only grown.
Shih’s predecessor, Yiin Chii-ming (尹啟銘), focused too much on an ECFA and overlooked growing domestic friction over the matter. Controversies surrounding the few attempts to publicize the would-be pact also backfired: A comic strip sparked outrage over ethnic stereotyping, while businesses fear more and more that an ECFA would benefit large Taiwanese corporations at the expense of smaller firms. The pan-green camp, meanwhile, argues that the pact would undermine Taiwan’s sovereignty.
The massive damage that came with Morakot and the Ma administration’s hamfisted response also triggered new doubts over the government’s ability to safeguard the national interest in negotiations with China.
Government officials erroneously argue that an ECFA would automatically activate FTA talks with other countries. The reality is that Taiwan must do its own ground work to make this happen.
The Ma administration’s enthusiasm for an ECFA has been tempered by Beijing’s lukewarm attitude toward talks with Taiwan following the visit of exiled Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama last month, and this could be an additional reason for the ministry’s change of heart.
No one should assume that the ministry’s renewed interest in launching FTA talks with other countries means the Ma administration has abandoned its China-centric policy stance.
This development, however, confirms that unforeseen events, such as natural disasters and global crises, can provide the public with opportunities to make governments listen and, if necessary, to rethink their strategy and policy priorities.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS