Ethnocentrism can backfire
Recent ethnic riots in Xinjiang and Tibet are a direct consequence of a Han-centric mentality and jingoistic patriotism, which no doubt adds fuel to the fire. As Samuel Johnson once said: “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.” I am not necessarily condemning patriotism — waving flags and shouting slogans to boost adrenaline levels in demonstrations or on the battlefield. Nor do I condone such irrational behavior as suicide bombers or kamikaze-like tactics.
However, we must ask ourselves why China has had problems with its neighbors, whether it is Tibet, Xinjiang, Myanmar, Vietnam, Taiwan, South Korea, Mongolia or Russia. Furthermore, Chinese living or traveling abroad are quite rowdy and disrespectful of local cultures in public places. I saw enough of them in the US. Though the virtue of hardworking Chinese cannot be denied in Southeast Asia, some of their unfair business practices have led to resentment toward them.
Of course it is also unfair to lay blame on the Chinese only, but a better assimilation would have been more constructive for both Chinese and locals.
To maintain stability, the Chinese must treat their neighbors as equals and respect their cultures even if they view some of them as antiquated and impractical. Minorities should not be viewed as hicks from the backwaters or barbarians; they should be treated with dignity. It seems a better solution to the conundrum in Xinjiang and Tibet is entirely plausible: Offer large-scale preferential treatment to the disadvantaged locals; tolerate and coexist with different cultures and religions.
No amount of ammunition, tanks and Han-superiority mentality can pacify the troubled regions in the long haul. Diversity, not adversity, is the key.
YANG CHIN-WEI
Chiayi
The name game
English-language newspapers in Japan have for many years been writing the names of Japanese people following the Western style: given name, surname. In addition, many Japanese businessmen and politicians have English name cards that follow the same Western style. I feel that it is time for Taiwan for start following this trend.
Instead of writing President “Ma Ying-jeou” (馬英九) in the English-language newspapers here in and in New York and London, let’s start writing his name as “Ying-jeou Ma.” As for former presidents, let’s refer to them as “Teng-hui Lee” (李登輝) and “Shui-bian Chen” (陳水扁). After all, the English-language newspapers in Taiwan call Japanese politicians by their first and then last names —“Junichiro Koizumi” and “Yukio Hatoyama” — for example, and those names are well-known in the West.
There’s another reason I suggest writing Taiwanese names in English news stories in the Western style: This style will help differentiate Taiwan from China, and readers in the West will come to understand that “Ying-jeou Ma” must be from Taiwan, since he uses the new system of naming, while Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) must be from China, since he uses the old system.
There is already a small difference between the way names are written in English in China and Taiwan: Notice that it’s “Ma Ying-jeou” with a hyphen between “Ying” and “jeou,” while Chinese do not usually include hyphens when Romanizing their names.
This way, foreigners understand that Hu Jintao is from China, while Ma Ying-jeou (or in the new system “Ying-jeou Ma”) is from Taiwan.
DAN BLOOM
Chiayi
Don’t fear the Dalai Lama
Unfortunately, we had Typhoon Morakot. Fortunately, we then had a visit by the Dalai Lama. Morakot and the Dalai Lama are two forces that have come together so dramatically this year.
While we feel very sorry for the 700 or so victims of Morakot, the Dalai Lama stands not only for spiritual consolation, but also for freedom and democracy. Yes, the Dalai Lama came to boost freedom and democracy in Taiwan while Ma’s administration only cares about the economic ties with China.
Who is afraid of the Dalai Lama if one loves freedom and democracy? The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has transformed the whole of China into one large prison. Of course, the Dalai Lama is hated by the CCP. While the CCP hopes the Dalai Lama will be silenced forever, we Taiwanese would love for him to visit again.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is afraid of the Dalai Lama because it sides with the CCP. This time people power won out and the Dalai Lama was able to visit.
The impact and influence of the Dalai Lama will continue because his presence in Taiwan inspires the Taiwanese and people in many other countries.
What Taiwan needs is not only weapons against any military threat but also the spiritual power to be fearless and to abide by dreams of freedom and democracy. This is the essential meaning of the Dalai Lama’s visit. He had the heart to come; we should have the courage to welcome and thank him.
NI KUO-JUNG
Hsinchu
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS