Ethnocentrism can backfire
Recent ethnic riots in Xinjiang and Tibet are a direct consequence of a Han-centric mentality and jingoistic patriotism, which no doubt adds fuel to the fire. As Samuel Johnson once said: “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.” I am not necessarily condemning patriotism — waving flags and shouting slogans to boost adrenaline levels in demonstrations or on the battlefield. Nor do I condone such irrational behavior as suicide bombers or kamikaze-like tactics.
However, we must ask ourselves why China has had problems with its neighbors, whether it is Tibet, Xinjiang, Myanmar, Vietnam, Taiwan, South Korea, Mongolia or Russia. Furthermore, Chinese living or traveling abroad are quite rowdy and disrespectful of local cultures in public places. I saw enough of them in the US. Though the virtue of hardworking Chinese cannot be denied in Southeast Asia, some of their unfair business practices have led to resentment toward them.
Of course it is also unfair to lay blame on the Chinese only, but a better assimilation would have been more constructive for both Chinese and locals.
To maintain stability, the Chinese must treat their neighbors as equals and respect their cultures even if they view some of them as antiquated and impractical. Minorities should not be viewed as hicks from the backwaters or barbarians; they should be treated with dignity. It seems a better solution to the conundrum in Xinjiang and Tibet is entirely plausible: Offer large-scale preferential treatment to the disadvantaged locals; tolerate and coexist with different cultures and religions.
No amount of ammunition, tanks and Han-superiority mentality can pacify the troubled regions in the long haul. Diversity, not adversity, is the key.
YANG CHIN-WEI
Chiayi
The name game
English-language newspapers in Japan have for many years been writing the names of Japanese people following the Western style: given name, surname. In addition, many Japanese businessmen and politicians have English name cards that follow the same Western style. I feel that it is time for Taiwan for start following this trend.
Instead of writing President “Ma Ying-jeou” (馬英九) in the English-language newspapers here in and in New York and London, let’s start writing his name as “Ying-jeou Ma.” As for former presidents, let’s refer to them as “Teng-hui Lee” (李登輝) and “Shui-bian Chen” (陳水扁). After all, the English-language newspapers in Taiwan call Japanese politicians by their first and then last names —“Junichiro Koizumi” and “Yukio Hatoyama” — for example, and those names are well-known in the West.
There’s another reason I suggest writing Taiwanese names in English news stories in the Western style: This style will help differentiate Taiwan from China, and readers in the West will come to understand that “Ying-jeou Ma” must be from Taiwan, since he uses the new system of naming, while Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) must be from China, since he uses the old system.
There is already a small difference between the way names are written in English in China and Taiwan: Notice that it’s “Ma Ying-jeou” with a hyphen between “Ying” and “jeou,” while Chinese do not usually include hyphens when Romanizing their names.
This way, foreigners understand that Hu Jintao is from China, while Ma Ying-jeou (or in the new system “Ying-jeou Ma”) is from Taiwan.
DAN BLOOM
Chiayi
Don’t fear the Dalai Lama
Unfortunately, we had Typhoon Morakot. Fortunately, we then had a visit by the Dalai Lama. Morakot and the Dalai Lama are two forces that have come together so dramatically this year.
While we feel very sorry for the 700 or so victims of Morakot, the Dalai Lama stands not only for spiritual consolation, but also for freedom and democracy. Yes, the Dalai Lama came to boost freedom and democracy in Taiwan while Ma’s administration only cares about the economic ties with China.
Who is afraid of the Dalai Lama if one loves freedom and democracy? The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has transformed the whole of China into one large prison. Of course, the Dalai Lama is hated by the CCP. While the CCP hopes the Dalai Lama will be silenced forever, we Taiwanese would love for him to visit again.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is afraid of the Dalai Lama because it sides with the CCP. This time people power won out and the Dalai Lama was able to visit.
The impact and influence of the Dalai Lama will continue because his presence in Taiwan inspires the Taiwanese and people in many other countries.
What Taiwan needs is not only weapons against any military threat but also the spiritual power to be fearless and to abide by dreams of freedom and democracy. This is the essential meaning of the Dalai Lama’s visit. He had the heart to come; we should have the courage to welcome and thank him.
NI KUO-JUNG
Hsinchu
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS