The Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama recently visited Taiwan to pray for the victims of Typhoon Morakot. In the face of constant pressure from Beijing and international media coverage of the visit, the Dalai Lama, in his profound wisdom and benevolence, turned the visit into a display of passive resistance and peace in the spirit of Indian independence leader Mohandas Gandhi.
The Buddhist leader’s visit to Taiwan was not a big matter. As a US Department of State official said, Washington did not believe it would “result in increased tension in the region.” But Beijing did all it could to add fuel to the flames and even enlisted the help of Taiwanese gangsters in China to organize protests against the spiritual leader in Taiwan, while Taiwan’s pro-China media outlets became mouthpieces of the Chinese government. In doing so, they sacrificed their credibility and lost more than they gained.
During his visit, the Dalai Lama remained composed while being interviewed by media outlets and said he was not disappointed about not meeting President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
In response to speculation that the spiritual leader’s visit would have an adverse impact on cross-strait relations, Ma said it was premature to jump to that conclusion.
Some critics said the visit was a result of political scheming, but the Dalai Lama said he was here purely on a religious mission, although some “specialists” in Taiwan tried to second-guess his motives. He also suggested that the protesters could visit China to promote democracy. There is no doubt that all these were directed at Ma and his Chinese counterpart, Hu Jintao (胡錦濤).
Every place the Dalai Lama visited, people could feel the warmth he brought. When typhoon survivors from Siaolin Village (小林) in Kaohsiung County, which was washed away by floods, told him their family members were buried under mud and rubble, he immediately spread a waterproof mat on the ground and began a ritual of blessing. Such behavior moved the hearts of numerous disaster victims.
When he heard someone crying out loud: “Someone has cancer. She needs your help” as he walked out of the venue for a ritual, he performed a forehead-to-forehead blessing service and gave the patient medication. This scene is in stark contrast to the hypocrisy of politicians and their empty words.
In 1959, dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) recognized the temporary government of the Dalai Lama as the legitimate Tibetan government in accordance with Article 120 of the Constitution and said the Republic of China would continue to work to achieve the goal of self-determination together with the Tibetan people.
Whether Tibet should be separated from China is mentioned in both Taiwan’s and China’s constitutions. As such, if Taiwan were to cooperate with Beijing and take a harsher approach toward the matter, it would not reflect well on Taiwan.
The Dalai Lama’s nephew, Khedroob Thondup, once said: “This is not communist Taiwan; it’s democratic Taiwan.” The question is, can Taiwan hold up to its democratic ideals.
Lu I-ming is the former publisher and president of Taiwan Shin Sheng Daily News.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS