As numbers don’t necessarily reflect economic reality, Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) is attempting to use an unconventional approach to track economic activities to get a feel of the public pulse. But his favored references — such as the stock index, restaurant revenues and the number of cargo trucks on freeways — could be a guise to cover up his and the new Cabinet’s limited knowledge of macroeconomics, as well as a lack of vision to shape economic policies.
During an interview with the Chinese-language United Evening News on Thursday, Wu said that traditional economic measures, such as GDP, the unemployment rate and the consumer price index, to some extent fail to truly reflect how the public feels about the economy.
Wu said that government officials should look into alternative measures, such as those mentioned above, because they are easily understood by the public.
Wu’s new approach sounds appealing, but it is doubtful that current economic data and traditional methods had anything to do with falling public support for the government.
The informal indices the new premier suggested are interesting, timely and easy to grasp. But they have their limitations, because they reflect the economic climate in the short term and can be twisted by abnormal, unexpected factors in some cases.
What is of interest is that Wu recognized a vital truth — that the new Cabinet must satisfy public needs when drafting economic policies. Wu rightly understood that this is key to political stability, which in turn is crucial to economic growth and long-term prosperity.
The question is whether Wu and his new economic team — composed of old Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) technocrats, none of whom possess a strong knowledge of macroeconomics — have gained a real understanding of what the public needs and what kind of economic progress the nation should be pursuing.
The economic challenges facing Taiwan now are its over-dependence on China, a fast deteriorating labor market, weakening household income and a record public debt that needs to be remedied to sustain the nation’s competitive sovereign credit ratings. An excessive emphasis on exports to drive economic growth also deters private investment in domestic services, which could help transform the nation’s economic structure.
Unfortunately, despite all the talk of “coming to terms with the reality of public opinion” and “doing its utmost to address public interests,” there’s no signs of a slowdown in President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) push to sign an economic cooperation framework agreement with China even after the Cabinet reshuffle.
A look at the new Cabinet shows that the government has ditched academics — who it thinks are idealistic and have little connection to reality — as it drafts the nation’s long-term economic development and reform program. Instead, the government favored technocrats like Tsai Hsun-hsiung (蔡勳雄), the new chairman of the Council for Economic Planning and Development (CEPD); Shih Yen-shiang (施顏祥), the new economics minister; and Lee Sush-der (李述德), the finance minister.
This selection also makes it clear that senior officials who could have initiated financial reforms and aided the nation’s economic transition are gone with the departure of Paul Chiu (邱正雄) as vice premier and Chen Tain-jy (陳添枝) as CEPD chairman. It also implies that new economic team in Wu’s Cabinet is unlikely to steer new policy initiatives, but will only carry out the administration’s existing policies.
This begs the question of whether Ma has a clear vision on financial and economic policies.
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
Last week, 24 Republican representatives in the US Congress proposed a resolution calling for US President Donald Trump’s administration to abandon the US’ “one China” policy, calling it outdated, counterproductive and not reflective of reality, and to restore official diplomatic relations with Taiwan, enter bilateral free-trade agreement negotiations and support its entry into international organizations. That is an exciting and inspiring development. To help the US government and other nations further understand that Taiwan is not a part of China, that those “one China” policies are contrary to the fact that the two countries across the Taiwan Strait are independent and
RSS