Department of Health (DOH) Minister Yaung Chih-liang (楊志良) said recently that we cannot directly link death after treatment with the vaccine for A(H1N1) influenza to the vaccine itself and that further studies are needed.
Since this involves the risks posed by vaccinations, the ministry should explain the risks to the public and take proper precautions.
Earlier last month, a New York Times editorial said the US government took a series of steps to prepare for a potential A(H1N1) pandemic. Public officials were instructed to stockpile antiviral drugs. When a swine flu case emerged in April, diagnostic kits to detect the virus were created for use nationwide and domestic companies were enrolled to make the vaccine.
In addition, the government signed contracts with several farmers in Pennsylvania and requisitioned their eggs to grow flu vaccine.
By the middle of next month, the US will have at least 80 million doses ready for a mass immunization program. It seems everything has proceeded smoothly and is under control.
However, the weakest link in this chain of preparations is the federal bureaucracy’s head-in-the-sand attitude toward explaining the risks of the vaccination program to the public, which may cause all those efforts to come to naught.
In Taiwan, this is reflected in the DOH’s torpor in informing the public of any risks posed by flu vaccine, despite repeated assurances that domestically produced flu vaccines are safe and effective.
Some risks posed by treatment with the flu vaccine are predictable.
The real controversy, however, will not appear until after the health authorities begin administering flu vaccinations on a large scale this fall and winter.
The DOH will issue 10 million doses of the vaccine, three times the number of people receiving seasonal influenza vaccines in previous years.
That being the case, the probabilities of side effects caused by the vaccine will increase significantly.
In 1976, one in 100,000 people in the US who received the H1N1 flu vaccine suffered from side effects, developing Guillain-Barre syndrome — a crippling nerve disorder that caused many deaths. Some academics argue that it might have been related to the antigen in vaccines or toxins in contaminated germs during the manufacturing process.
Will similar reactions be seen in Taiwan following the implementation of a mass vaccination program?
Statistically speaking, it is inevitable that some of the nearly 1 million people receiving vaccines this fall will become ill or die.
If anyone happens to get ill or die after being vaccinated, it will likely be the result of underlying health problems, although the vaccine will often be blamed.
For example, pregnant women infected with swine flu are four times more likely to become severely ill or die than ordinary people.
But statistics show that about one in seven pregnancies ends in a miscarriage. Thus, after pregnant women get the vaccine, a miscarriage may coincidentally happen. Some will likely attribute it to the vaccine.
Now that the DOH has given pregnant women priority for the future flu vaccine program, a major controversy could ensue.
If this were to happen, it would certainly turn into a political storm.
Public health officials should be prepared.
Liou Pei-pai is a former director of the Taiwan Animal Health Research Institute.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS