Conspiracy theory limbo
Dear Johnny,
I’ve been pondering some questions unrelated to Morakot and hope you’ll be able to enlighten your eager fans:
1. Is there some connection between your namesake MRT line and the frequent breakdowns on it?
Could it be that the government is Out To Get You and everyone else living in the district?
2. Whatever happened to Cathy Pacific?
Did the two of you break up?
Surely your devoted readers should be able to vote on this — Taiwan is still a democracy, isn’t it?
PROF. JUNE TEUFEL DREYER
Department of
Political Science,
University of Miami
Johnny replies: I admit to a weakness for conspiracy theories, but in this case, alas, it would make no temporal sense. All of the mechanical and logistical problems with the Neihu Line existed long before I embarked on my current career as Mocksmith Emeritus.
What you may see, however, is my neighbors Out To Get The Mayor before it’s all over.
As for my gal Cathy, she remains in existential limbo in Taitung. We are still together, however. Lately she’s had the tape measure out in the disaster zone to see just how wide the riverbeds have become. Still, votes are welcome if readers think this will bring her back.
The mud’s on their hands
Dear Johnny,
What’s with the conspicuous absence of mud flyin’ through the air? I would’ve expected at least a peep or two from the Democratic Progressive Party on the handling of Typhoon Morakot.
They’ve been pretty quiet about the whole thing, even when foreign and domestic media had Mr Ma on the ropes.
They gonna start using this to their advantage at one point, ya think?
TREVOR JOHNSTON
Johnny replies: Well, Trevor, since I received your e-mail, the party has pulled off one of its smartest moves in years: staying reasonably quiet while grassroots officials with party links invited the Dalai Lama.
In the meantime, hacks from party central have been getting their hands dirty down south, talking to victims and helping with the clean-up. It’s called “getting closer to the people” and, Matsu save us, may augur a new respect for connectedness and feedback in the party.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not