A gathering of Asian and US diplomats, economists and academics in Honolulu, Hawaii, came to the surprising conclusion that no Asian nation is willing or able to assume leadership in Asia despite the economic and political progress of recent decades.
The Asian delegates and US “Asia hands” agreed that China is not ready, Japan is not willing and that India is just emerging onto the world stage, while the US is preoccupied with Afghanistan, the Middle East and the economy. Moreover, Asian international organizations such as ASEAN have so far shown themselves to be mostly talk shops.
Most of those in the conference asserted that peace and prosperity in Asia would be best served by a balance of power, especially between China and the US. No one suggested that Beijing and Washington forge a condominium over Asia but all agreed that armed conflict would be disastrous.
This consensus was surprising because a widening view among Asian leaders asserts that power is shifting from West to East.
Kishore Mahbubani, a prominent Singaporean diplomat and scholar, has explored this thesis in a book entitled The New Asian Hemisphere: The Irresistible Shift of Power to the East.
The Asian and US delegates in Honolulu met in a senior policy seminar at the East-West Center, a research and education organization funded largely by the US Congress. Under the conference rules, speakers and those who took part in the discussion cannot be identified, supposedly to encourage candor.
“China is not oriented toward foreign policy but is obsessed with domestic issues, somewhat like the United States,” an Asian delegate said.
China’s first major venture into international relations — leading the six-party talks among China, South Korea, Japan, Russia, the US and North Korea to persuade North Korea to give up its nuclear weapons — has gone nowhere in six years.
Internal dissent in China was underscored by uprisings in Tibet last year and in Xinjiang earlier this year. The worldwide economic crisis has hit China hard and driven the government, always anxious about its hold on power, to adopt a 10-point stimulus program. Abroad, territorial disputes have caused fear of China, especially in Southeast Asia.
Japan, still wrapped in the passive cocoon into which it retreated after the devastating defeat of World War II, is constrained by its divisive politics. In the last three years, Tokyo has seen three prime ministers, four foreign ministers and six defense ministers. The long-ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) is predicted to lose to the untested Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) in the election set for Aug. 30.
“The DPJ is a hodge-podge of old-line Socialists and deserters from the LDP and thus split,” an Asian delegate said. “Its leaders lack experience in government and have failed to cultivate the bureaucrats who really run things in Japan. It will have a rough time governing.”
As a potential leader, India was barely mentioned.
“India is in the equation for the first time,” said an American, lamenting the lack of attention to India.
A US military officer said that relations between Indian and US military forces had expanded.
“India,” he said, “is getting out and about.”
Some Asian and US delegates said that the US was declining in power, with US forces spread thin around the world and the economy troubled at home. Others disagreed.
“Are we seeing the twilight of the US in Asia?” an American asked.
His answer: “No, we are not withdrawing.”
Several speakers contended that the administration of former US president George W. Bush had neglected Asia while the administration of US President Barack Obama was seeking to reverse that perception.
“America has been like Rip Van Winkle, sleeping under a tree,” an American delegate said. “Now he’s awake but we have to see what he actually does.”
Richard Halloran is a freelance writer in Hawaii.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS