With the nation’s financial situation a source of immediate concern, the government has little choice: It must act fast to cut spending and broaden its sources of income, which is what Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) said in a recent interview with Dow Jones Newswires.
Liu said in the interview on Thursday that the government would present a plan within a month to deal with its deteriorating finances and soaring budget deficit.
Taiwan’s export-oriented economy has been hurt by the global downturn, with companies cutting jobs and tax revenues falling. Other governments are looking for exit strategies from their aggressive fiscal policies amid signs of economic recovery and the same should hold true for Taiwan.
A government budget proposal passed by the Cabinet on July 30 said the government expects NT$1.55 trillion (US$47.3 billion) in revenues and NT$1.74 trillion in spending next year, resulting in a budget gap of NT$189.1 billion — 40.5 percent higher than this year’s deficit of NT$134.6 billion and the highest level in the last four years.
To handle the NT$189.1 billion deficit and a debt repayment of NT$66 billion for next year, the government has decided to use debt financing, claiming that the combined NT$255.1 billion in debt financing would represent only 14.7 percent of next year’s budgeted spending (NT$1.74 trillion), therefore keeping it below the 15 percent debt ceiling stipulated in the Public Debt Act (公共債務法).
But the actual size of the debt financing will be much more than NT$255.1 billion, because the government is planning to borrow money for an economic stimulus budget of NT$192.2 billion — part of the four-year NT$500 billion economic stimulus package — and has cited special regulations to help it circumvent the 15 percent debt ceiling.
What this means is, the government will need to borrow money or issue bonds to finance a total of NT$447.4 billion next year.
Following tax cuts since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took office last year, however, tax revenues have declined substantially, even as the administration’s stimulus measures boost government debt.
Under the Cabinet’s budget proposal, tax revenues are projected to sink to NT$1.12 trillion next year, down 11.8 percent from this year. Taiwan is likely to see government debt rise to as much as NT$4.55 trillion by the end of next year, a level that is NT$240 billion higher than this year and represents an increase of NT$770 billion since the beginning of Ma’s term.
Increasing public debt and declining tax revenues have already raised concerns at both Fitch Ratings and Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, prompting the two agencies to revise downward their outlook for Taiwan earlier this year from stable to negative.
While the government looks for other ways to boost revenues — such as accelerating auctions of state-owned land and cutting spending elsewhere — what it should do is implement conservative and prudent policies to maintain fiscal discipline.
Unfortunately, the Cabinet’s budget proposal indicates that it will still stand by its aggressive fiscal stance, spending another NT$526.8 billion on infrastructure alone next year, up 4.9 percent from this year.
More government spending doesn’t guarantee a better economy: The key is effective use of government funding. With the Cabinet’s reputation in this regard under fire from the Ministry of Audit, the Ma administration is unlikely to put fiscal policy back on track.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS