For 18 months since Microsoft’s unsolicited takeover bid for Yahoo, an alliance between the two Internet giants has been the obvious — perhaps only — way for the two companies to compete with Web monster Google.
The buyout faltered when Yahoo chief executive Jerry Yang made what was arguably one of the worst business decisions in modern history, holding out for more than the US$47.5 billion that Microsoft was willing to pay.
Now his successor, Carol Bartz, has picked up the pieces at Yahoo and inked a 10-year search and advertising alliance with the world’s largest software company, in which Microsoft’s Bing search engine provides the technology and Yahoo the sales team.
The strategy espoused by Bartz and Microsoft chief executive Steve Ballmer is clear — by combining forces, “Microhoo” search will have the breadth, scale and depth to offer Internet users and advertisers a convincing alternative to Google.
However, don’t expect to see executives at the Googleplex quaking in their flip flops anytime soon.
“We’re interested to learn more about the deal,” Google spokesman Matt Furman said. “There has traditionally been a lot of competition online and our experience is that competition brings about great things for users.”
Privately, one Google source said: “We are not writing them off, but we will continue to innovate and they would need to perform the comeback of the century to beat us.”
Analysts were divided about the impact of the Yahoo-Microsoft deal, but seemed to agree on one thing — the best that the two companies can hope for is to remain a distant second in search advertising, the Internet’s most lucrative sector.
Many believed that the two years the companies would spend on executing the deal would actually create a significant market disruption, allowing Google to further consolidate its dominant position. This is especially true if the companies were made to jump through hoops to satisfy antitrust regulators.
Yet, the annals of business history are littered with dinosaurs who once ruled their industries, only to fail — through myopia, hubris and inertia — to adapt to changing market conditions. Humbled automaker General Motors — gone from titan to Titanic — is the latest example, surviving only on government assistance, like one of its own, laid-off assembly-line workers.
As the nature of Internet search changes, “Microhoo” could have a great opportunity to get a jump on Google, said Shar VanBoskirk, a search analyst at Forrester Research.
“Google is a great search engine, but the next wave of search will be more than just finding Web sites,” she said. “Both Bing and Yahoo try to do that and the partnership will help them develop the online concierge experience that they offer.”
That long-term prospect was of little comfort on Wednesday to investors unfortunate enough to own Yahoo shares. The company’s stock price slid as much as 12 percent in morning trading after the deal was announced.
Many commentators said that investors were disappointed that the hook up with Microsoft failed to include an up-front payment to Yahoo, but the real reason for the slide could go deeper. By outsourcing the core of its business, Yahoo could become irrelevant as an Internet player by the end of its 10-year deal with Microsoft.
“Yahoo is essentially getting out of search,” said portfolio manager Eric Jackson, an activist Yahoo shareholder. “I question if this is the right thing strategically.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
The arrest in France of Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov has brought into sharp focus one of the major conflicts of our age. On one hand, we want privacy in our digital lives, which is why we like the kind of end-to-end encryption Telegram promises. On the other, we want the government to be able to stamp out repugnant online activities — such as child pornography or terrorist plotting. The reality is that we cannot have our cake and eat it, too. Durov last month was charged with complicity in crimes taking place on the app, including distributing child pornography,
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers