On America’s highways, wind turbines may be the ultimate oversize load.
Trucks carrying silvery blades nearly half a football field long have been lumbering through this placid coastal town all summer, backing up traffic as they slowly exit the roadway. Huge, tubular chunks of tower also pass through. Tall pieces of machinery looking somewhat like jet engines travel at night because they require special routing to avoid overpasses.
As demand for clean energy grows, towns around the country are finding their traffic patterns roiled as convoys roll through carrying disassembled towers that will reach more than 76m in height, as well as motors, blades and other parts. Escorted by patrol cars and gawked at by pedestrians, the equipment must often travel hundreds of kilometers from ports or factories to the remote, windy destinations where the turbines are erected.
In Belfast, officials have worked hard to keep the nuisance to a minimum, but about 200 trucks are passing through this year on their way to western Maine, carrying parts that have been shipped from Denmark and Vietnam.
Plenty can go wrong despite months of planning. In Idaho and Texas, trucks laden with tall turbine parts have slammed into interstate overpasses, requiring hundreds of thousands of dollars in repairs. In Minnesota last year, a truck carrying a tubular tower section got stuck at a railroad crossing; an approaching train stopped just in time. Also in Minnesota, a woman was killed last September when her car, driven by her husband, collided at an intersection with a truck carrying a wind turbine. (After a police investigation, local officials found that the truck driver was not at fault.)
Maine had a glitch of its own two years ago after a truck carrying a big piece of turbine got stuck for hours while trying to round a corner near Searsport, a port near Belfast that receives many turbine parts from overseas.
“It left a nice gouge in Route 1,” recalled Ben Tracy, who works nearby at a marine equipment store and saw the incident.
On a per-turbine basis, the cost of transportation and logistics generally varies from around US$100,000 to US$150,000, according to John Dunlop, an engineer with the American Wind Energy Association.
Wolfgang Neuhoff, the project manager for TransCanada, which is developing the Maine wind farm, indicated that his numbers were probably above that range, though he declined to be specific.
In Belfast, the onslaught of turbine-toting trucks did not receive a warm welcome at first from some local business owners, who feared that rerouting traffic during the summer tourist season — the best time to transport turbines in a wintry state like Maine — would keep patrons away.
“We were afraid that the state was going to put up signs to avoid Belfast because of the delays,” said Jerry Savitz, the owner of Darby’s Restaurant in Belfast, who added that locals nonetheless supported the idea of windmills because of the clean energy they create.
After discussions with the town, the wind developers agreed to send the tall nacelles, which sit at the top of the turbine towers and contain the electrical generating components, through town at night, so few people would be delayed. Because they had to pass through residential neighborhoods in order to avoid low underpasses, residents feared that a few trees would need to be chopped down. But in the end, the trees were spared.
The grass was not so lucky: several green medians along the route were turned into roadway so that the trucks did not run over curbs while making wide turns.
The cost and hassle of transporting the huge, heavy turbines has sparked interest in manufacturing turbines in the US rather than in Europe. Last year 24 states opened, expanded or announced turbine manufacturing plants, according to the American Wind Energy Association. By value, about half of all turbine parts are now manufactured in the US, Dunlop said.
Even if more turbine parts are made in the US, experts say that transportation logistics are starting to limit how large — and as a result how powerful — wind turbines can get. Some blades are already more than 50m long, and those are “reaching the limits of what you can ship on the Interstate or on rail cars,” said Peter Stricker, vice president of strategic project development at Clipper Windpower, a wind developer and manufacturer.
There is talk of breaking a blade up into multiple pieces, but “that’s a very significant structural concern,” said Stricker, who also noted that tower bases were getting too large to squeeze through interstate underpasses.
In Texas, the state with by far the most wind turbines, the constant truck traffic has created another challenge: It is tearing up small roads in the western part of the state, where the turbines are being rapidly erected.
“You get what we call alligator cracking,” said Stacey Young, a pavement engineer for the Lubbock district of the Texas Department of Transportation, referring to small seams in the pavement.
One paved road in her area is “basically a gravel road now” because of the trucks going through, Young said. She has appealed to state lawmakers to require the developers to help pay for the upkeep of the roads, but so far to no avail.
A partial solution for Young’s concerns may be at hand. The vast majority of turbine parts travel by truck, but in Texas and elsewhere, some wind companies are looking to move more turbine parts by train to save money.
General Electric, a big turbine maker, says rail transport can be up to 50 percent cheaper over long distances, and the rail company Union Pacific saw its wind-related shipments more than double last year.
But even the train routes must avoid low overpasses when big pieces of wind turbines are aboard.
“It’s not your typical rail-car shipments,” said Tom Lange, a Union Pacific spokesman.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS