On America’s highways, wind turbines may be the ultimate oversize load.
Trucks carrying silvery blades nearly half a football field long have been lumbering through this placid coastal town all summer, backing up traffic as they slowly exit the roadway. Huge, tubular chunks of tower also pass through. Tall pieces of machinery looking somewhat like jet engines travel at night because they require special routing to avoid overpasses.
As demand for clean energy grows, towns around the country are finding their traffic patterns roiled as convoys roll through carrying disassembled towers that will reach more than 76m in height, as well as motors, blades and other parts. Escorted by patrol cars and gawked at by pedestrians, the equipment must often travel hundreds of kilometers from ports or factories to the remote, windy destinations where the turbines are erected.
In Belfast, officials have worked hard to keep the nuisance to a minimum, but about 200 trucks are passing through this year on their way to western Maine, carrying parts that have been shipped from Denmark and Vietnam.
Plenty can go wrong despite months of planning. In Idaho and Texas, trucks laden with tall turbine parts have slammed into interstate overpasses, requiring hundreds of thousands of dollars in repairs. In Minnesota last year, a truck carrying a tubular tower section got stuck at a railroad crossing; an approaching train stopped just in time. Also in Minnesota, a woman was killed last September when her car, driven by her husband, collided at an intersection with a truck carrying a wind turbine. (After a police investigation, local officials found that the truck driver was not at fault.)
Maine had a glitch of its own two years ago after a truck carrying a big piece of turbine got stuck for hours while trying to round a corner near Searsport, a port near Belfast that receives many turbine parts from overseas.
“It left a nice gouge in Route 1,” recalled Ben Tracy, who works nearby at a marine equipment store and saw the incident.
On a per-turbine basis, the cost of transportation and logistics generally varies from around US$100,000 to US$150,000, according to John Dunlop, an engineer with the American Wind Energy Association.
Wolfgang Neuhoff, the project manager for TransCanada, which is developing the Maine wind farm, indicated that his numbers were probably above that range, though he declined to be specific.
In Belfast, the onslaught of turbine-toting trucks did not receive a warm welcome at first from some local business owners, who feared that rerouting traffic during the summer tourist season — the best time to transport turbines in a wintry state like Maine — would keep patrons away.
“We were afraid that the state was going to put up signs to avoid Belfast because of the delays,” said Jerry Savitz, the owner of Darby’s Restaurant in Belfast, who added that locals nonetheless supported the idea of windmills because of the clean energy they create.
After discussions with the town, the wind developers agreed to send the tall nacelles, which sit at the top of the turbine towers and contain the electrical generating components, through town at night, so few people would be delayed. Because they had to pass through residential neighborhoods in order to avoid low underpasses, residents feared that a few trees would need to be chopped down. But in the end, the trees were spared.
The grass was not so lucky: several green medians along the route were turned into roadway so that the trucks did not run over curbs while making wide turns.
The cost and hassle of transporting the huge, heavy turbines has sparked interest in manufacturing turbines in the US rather than in Europe. Last year 24 states opened, expanded or announced turbine manufacturing plants, according to the American Wind Energy Association. By value, about half of all turbine parts are now manufactured in the US, Dunlop said.
Even if more turbine parts are made in the US, experts say that transportation logistics are starting to limit how large — and as a result how powerful — wind turbines can get. Some blades are already more than 50m long, and those are “reaching the limits of what you can ship on the Interstate or on rail cars,” said Peter Stricker, vice president of strategic project development at Clipper Windpower, a wind developer and manufacturer.
There is talk of breaking a blade up into multiple pieces, but “that’s a very significant structural concern,” said Stricker, who also noted that tower bases were getting too large to squeeze through interstate underpasses.
In Texas, the state with by far the most wind turbines, the constant truck traffic has created another challenge: It is tearing up small roads in the western part of the state, where the turbines are being rapidly erected.
“You get what we call alligator cracking,” said Stacey Young, a pavement engineer for the Lubbock district of the Texas Department of Transportation, referring to small seams in the pavement.
One paved road in her area is “basically a gravel road now” because of the trucks going through, Young said. She has appealed to state lawmakers to require the developers to help pay for the upkeep of the roads, but so far to no avail.
A partial solution for Young’s concerns may be at hand. The vast majority of turbine parts travel by truck, but in Texas and elsewhere, some wind companies are looking to move more turbine parts by train to save money.
General Electric, a big turbine maker, says rail transport can be up to 50 percent cheaper over long distances, and the rail company Union Pacific saw its wind-related shipments more than double last year.
But even the train routes must avoid low overpasses when big pieces of wind turbines are aboard.
“It’s not your typical rail-car shipments,” said Tom Lange, a Union Pacific spokesman.
Former US president Jimmy Carter’s legacy regarding Taiwan is a complex tapestry woven with decisions that, while controversial, were instrumental in shaping the nation’s path and its enduring relationship with the US. As the world reflects on Carter’s life and his recent passing at the age of 100, his presidency marked a transformative era in Taiwan-US-China relations, particularly through the landmark decision in 1978 to formally recognize the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as the sole legal government of China, effectively derecognizing the Republic of China (ROC) based in Taiwan. That decision continues to influence geopolitical dynamics and Taiwan’s unique
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) said that he expects this year to be a year of “peace.” However, this is ironic given the actions of some KMT legislators and politicians. To push forward several amendments, they went against the principles of legislation such as substantive deliberation, and even tried to remove obstacles with violence during the third readings of the bills. Chu says that the KMT represents the public interest, accusing President William Lai (賴清德) and the Democratic Progressive Party of fighting against the opposition. After pushing through the amendments, the KMT caucus demanded that Legislative Speaker
On New Year’s Day, it is customary to reflect on what the coming year might bring and how the past has brought about the current juncture. Just as Taiwan is preparing itself for what US president-elect Donald Trump’s second term would mean for its economy, national security and the cross-strait “status quo” this year, the passing of former US president Jimmy Carter on Monday at the age of 100 brought back painful memories of his 1978 decision to stop recognizing the Republic of China as the seat of China in favor of the People’s Republic of China. It is an
Beijing’s approval of a controversial mega-dam in the lower reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo River — which flows from Tibet — has ignited widespread debate over its strategic and environmental implications. The project exacerbates the complexities of India-China relations, and underscores Beijing’s push for hydropower dominance and potential weaponization of water against India. India and China are caught in a protracted territorial dispute along the Line of Actual Control. The approval of a dam on a transboundary river adds another layer to an already strained bilateral relationship, making dialogue and trust-building even more challenging, especially given that the two Asian