It was former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) who originally proposed upgrading the status of Taipei County and Taichung City as a means of getting voter support from those areas during his campaign for re-election in 2004. Now that it has become a popular issue, incumbent Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is exploiting the proposal to ensure KMT victory in elections for city mayors and county commissioners in December and for the presidential and legislative elections scheduled for 2012.
It was easy for Chen to write out this political check in 2004, but cashing it is a lot harder. Now Ma’s expanded version of the upgrade plan has compounded the problems.
The upgrade proposals have indeed been effective in mobilizing public opinion. The KMT long ago implemented a two-tier system of unequal funding between urban and rural local governments. Because of this, once a county is upgraded, its budget and ability to borrow money will improve, with more funds available for its government coffers. Civil servants will be promoted and their salaries raised, and they will control a bigger share of public funds.
Upgraded counties will be able to hire more personnel. As county commissioners expand their teams, their power will grow.
To make good on his promise, in 2007 Chen had to invent the curious category of “provisional municipality” (準直轄市) to allow for Taipei County’s upgrade.
Having been awarded this status, Taipei County took it as grounds for promoting officials and seeking more government funds.
At that time, the total budget allocation for local governments throughout Taiwan was NT$184 billion (US$5.54 billion), NT$80 billion of which was shared by Taipei and Kaohsiung cities, with only NT$8 billion to NT$9 billion going to Taipei County.
When Taipei County was promoted to a provisional municipality, it demanded a NT$30 billion share of Taipei and Kaohsiung’s NT$80 billion budget. This angered the two cities. The central government had no choice but to give Taipei County more money without taking funds away from Taipei and Kaohsiung cities.
While the central government acceded to the demands of Taipei and Kaohsiung, the rest of Taiwan paid the price. The total amount of central government funding available for all local governments did not grow, meaning that there was less left for everyone else.
Once Taipei County got its hands on this money, the first thing it did was promote officials. Deputy mayors and ranking officials at various levels were promoted one or two grades and their annual salaries raised by between NT$100,000 and NT$600,000. Councilors’ annual salaries will climb to NT$3 million. That was great news — for Taipei County officials, at least.
Furthermore, while Taipei and Kaohsiung cities each have more than 12,000 civil servants, Taipei County had fewer than 4,000. Now it is entitled to nearly 14,000. If it takes on the full number of new officials, the cost will reach NT$6 billion. With pay raises, it may be closer to NT$10 billion.
This means that the most of the extra budget Taipei County gets will go to employing officials. This is more than the central government can swallow, but, despite its efforts to stem the tide, Taipei County has taken on 1,200 new officials and allocated sufficient funds to pay them.
Still, Taipei County feels it is too far behind Taipei and Kaohsiung cities. Now that more cities and counties are scheduled for upgrades, they will demand higher funding as well and the central government will have little power to deny them.
Restructuring an organization usually means cutting personnel for the sake of efficiency. But when the KMT divided Taiwan’s eight counties into five municipalities and 16 counties and cities, it did the opposite by increasing the ranks of civil servants. This it did for the sake of giving jobs to its own people.
Today’s city and county mergers again involve placing large numbers of well-connected people in new bureaucratic positions. That is the KMT way.
Counties that will not be upgraded are clamoring about being treated as second-class citizens. In response, the government has no choice but to tell them that they too will get more funding.
So, everyone gets more money, but where will it come from? What does the central government plan to do? All it can do is hand over responsibility for high and medium-level affairs to local governments. They call it devolution of power, but in reality it means shifting the burden of central government expenditures onto the shoulders of local governments.
This means local governments will not in fact gain anything from their money grab. The only winners will be the civil servants and councilors.
Those who don’t want to be second-class citizens and those who don’t want to be left empty-handed will be vocal about their complaints. The Ma administration has picked up Chen’s proposal and made it into a disaster.
Just like Chen’s game of halving the membership of the legislature, the county and city mergers and upgrades will not only fail to improve administration, but will actually make things worse.
Lin Cho-shui is a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s