When teaching future studies I have called on social and political figures not to retain an industrial society mindset by thinking that government finances will never fail.
Following Iceland’s bankruptcy, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger recently declared a fiscal state of emergency as that state teeters on the brink. This is a warning we should all heed.
A more worrying problem is that Taiwan’s demographic structure is being gradually transformed from the pyramid shape of agrarian societies to the shape of an upside-down pyramid.
In other words, the taxpaying working population is shrinking as the proportion of the population receiving pensions or welfare benefits is growing. In 2004, retirement expenditure reached NT$210 billion (US$6.4 billion), the same as the amount of the government’s revenue from individual income tax that year. The numbers have continued to rise since then and set new records.
With the demographic structure retaining the shape of an upside-down pyramid, the nation’s fiscal deficit will inevitably increase. The government cannot continue to solve this problem by increasing budget spending, as industrial societies might, because the future working population won’t be able to pay enough taxes to sustain national expenses.
The pension system did not develop until after the industrial revolution. Labor relations and related social problems started to appear because the majority of people came to be employed by an enterprise or organization. To protect workers after retirement, governments created legislation regulating welfare and pension systems.
The Council for Economic Planning and Development has said that the decline in the nation’s population at the current rate will result in a population of 8 million people 100 years from now. As population distribution turns into an upside-down pyramid, many welfare and insurance structures are bound to collapse. This is evidenced by a huge deficit in labor insurance payments and the National Health Insurance’s debt of NT$51.1 billion.
In addition, the National Pension System was only launched in October last year, but the Ministry of Interior already expects a deficit of NT$8 billion next year and of more than NT$20 billion the following year. The government will not be able to sustain these welfare programs in their current form.
We need a new approach to career and life planning. The average lifespan in Taiwan is 78 years, while the average retirement age between 2001 and 2007 was 55. This means that people on average need to prepare funds for 23 years of retirement. If labor and health insurance are no longer guaranteed, post-retirement living and medical expenses will become a heavy burden. Thus, as I argue in my book Future Studies, we should prepare for this time our entire lives and avoid being a burden to our children.
How do we achieve this? Simple math: Save enough money to support yourself until death. As life expectancy expands, it will be necessary to postpone retirement and develop multiple areas of expertise. Postponement of retirement is an inevitable trend, and it can be done in one of two ways: by staying on at one’s job or by changing jobs. Regardless, the message is to keep working — to have a lifetime job, as it were. This is what is meant by the new concept of “silver-collar worker.”
But this does not mean that jobs will be there just because people want them. For most to find a job, it will be necessary to develop the expertise that a changing society needs. Whether we like it or not, the age of lifetime work has quietly arrived.
Chuang Chi-ming is a professor in the Department of Educational Management at National Taipei University.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
US president-elect Donald Trump continues to make nominations for his Cabinet and US agencies, with most of his picks being staunchly against Beijing. For US ambassador to China, Trump has tapped former US senator David Perdue. This appointment makes it crystal clear that Trump has no intention of letting China continue to steal from the US while infiltrating it in a surreptitious quasi-war, harming world peace and stability. Originally earning a name for himself in the business world, Perdue made his start with Chinese supply chains as a manager for several US firms. He later served as the CEO of Reebok and
Chinese Ministry of National Defense spokesman Wu Qian (吳謙) announced at a news conference that General Miao Hua (苗華) — director of the Political Work Department of the Central Military Commission — has been suspended from his duties pending an investigation of serious disciplinary breaches. Miao’s role within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) affects not only its loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), but also ideological control. This reflects the PLA’s complex internal power struggles, as well as its long-existing structural problems. Since its establishment, the PLA has emphasized that “the party commands the gun,” and that the military is
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
US president-elect Donald Trump in an interview with NBC News on Monday said he would “never say” if the US is committed to defending Taiwan against China. Trump said he would “prefer” that China does not attempt to invade Taiwan, and that he has a “very good relationship” with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Before committing US troops to defending Taiwan he would “have to negotiate things,” he said. This is a departure from the stance of incumbent US President Joe Biden, who on several occasions expressed resolutely that he would commit US troops in the event of a conflict in
RSS