Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega reportedly stood President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) up five times during his recent trip to Latin America. This has caused a chorus of criticism from both the ruling and opposition parties.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators suggested that the government recall the nation’s ambassador to Nicaragua, while opposition lawmakers blamed the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for neglecting its duties. Both the ambassador to Nicaragua and Minister of Foreign Affairs Francisco Ou (歐鴻鍊) should be held responsible for the entire affair.
Regardless of whether the incident was a result of Ortega’s disdain for Taiwan or the ministry’s negligence, the entire incident showed the major flaws behind Ma’s diplomatic strategy of placing more importance on cross-strait relations than on relations with other countries.
Just because cross-strait relations have improved does not mean Taiwan’s diplomatic relations have been secured. Whether the government keeps its mind on maintaining its relations with other countries is the decisive factor.
Since Ma gave precedence to cross-strait relations over Taiwan’s ties with other countries and declared a diplomatic truce with China, we have had a constant problem: How does the government view Taiwan’s diplomatic allies? Do we still value our relations with them?
In his first visit to Latin America last August, Ma was asked by the Honduran vice president how he looked at bilateral relations.
Meanwhile, it was recently reported that the Honduran ambassador complained about how the Ma government failed to fulfill its promise on a cooperative project between the two countries.
Similar incidents have occurred among other foreign representatives in Taiwan.
During his most recent trip to Latin America, Ma failed to address bilateral cooperative policies with the region, nor did he expound on his expectations of the relationship.
Instead, he talked about the improvement of cross-strait relations and how Taiwan has become a key factor reassuring the US on cross-strait matters. He proclaimed that he employed “legitimate diplomacy” instead of “dollar diplomacy,” which implies that Taiwan’s allies are just a whole bunch of greedy hooligans asking for financial aid.
Not only were Latin American allies told what Taiwan expects from bilateral relations, but they were also humiliated by the Ma government over having received political contributions from the former Democratic Progressive Party administration.
In addition, Ma did not respect their delicate attitude toward the US. These countries are likely to take their relationship with Taiwan seriously.
The incident with Ortega displays the government’s passive management of the nation’s diplomatic relations, which is the direct cause of the problems Taiwan is experiencing in its relationship with Latin America.
The suggestion by some lawmakers that the government take revenge by suspending cooperative projects with Nicaragua highlighted Taiwan’s narrow-minded attitude toward its diplomatic allies.
Such an arrogant and unhealthy mindset has caused the government to behave abnormally in its diplomatic relations with other countries.
Diplomatic relations can only be maintained by the government’s active management. It cannot be replaced by cross-strait detente, nor will it be maintained based on Taiwanese contempt for its diplomatic allies.
Lai I-chung is director of foreign policy studies at Taiwan Thinktank.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
It is almost three years since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin declared a friendship with “no limits” — weeks before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Since then, they have retreated from such rhetorical enthusiasm. The “no limits” language was quickly dumped, probably at Beijing’s behest. When Putin visited China in May last year, he said that he and his counterpart were “as close as brothers.” Xi more coolly called the Russian president “a good friend and a good neighbor.” China has conspicuously not reciprocated Putin’s description of it as an ally. Yet the partnership
The ancient Chinese military strategist Sun Tzu (孫子) said “know yourself and know your enemy and you will win a hundred battles.” Applied in our times, Taiwanese should know themselves and know the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) so that Taiwan will win a hundred battles and hopefully, deter the CCP. Taiwanese receive information daily about the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) threat from the Ministry of National Defense and news sources. One area that needs better understanding is which forces would the People’s Republic of China (PRC) use to impose martial law and what would be the consequences for living under PRC
Although former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo — known for being the most pro-Taiwan official to hold the post — is not in the second administration of US president-elect Donald Trump, he has maintained close ties with the former president and involved himself in think tank activities, giving him firsthand knowledge of the US’ national strategy. On Monday, Pompeo visited Taiwan for the fourth time, attending a Formosa Republican Association’s forum titled “Towards Permanent World Peace: The Shared Mission of the US and Taiwan.” At the event, he reaffirmed his belief in Taiwan’s democracy, liberty, human rights and independence, highlighting a
The US Department of Defense recently released this year’s “Report on Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China.” This annual report provides a comprehensive overview of China’s military capabilities, strategic objectives and evolving global ambitions. Taiwan features prominently in this year’s report, as capturing the nation remains central to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) vision of the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation,” a goal he has set for 2049. The report underscores Taiwan’s critical role in China’s long-term strategy, highlighting its significance as a geopolitical flashpoint and a key target in China’s quest to assert dominance
RSS