Taking a bird’s eye view of the ongoing process of merging and upgrading cities and counties, the government seems to have handled the matter in a manner completely lacking an academic basis. First, as urban development is irreversible, indivisible and unpredictable, it must be carried out in accordance with a plan rather than through trial and error. Next, the arrangement of three metropolises in the country, in my opinion, is not likely to achieve the desired result of balanced regional development.
Statistical research that I have conducted on the size and distribution of the populations of Taiwan’s rural and urban townships over the last three decades shows that the phenomenon of urban polarization has become increasingly serious.
The next issue is the question of what cities the population has gravitated toward. If we look at how the number of companies have increased in the four major planning divisions — northern, central, southern and eastern Taiwan — we find that companies have “homed in” on the north. In other words, whether we like it or not, under current conditions, the greater Taipei area has been, is and will continue to be the region where companies are concentrated, and this will lead to a natural increase in the local population and economic activities.
My conclusion is therefore that it will be hard to resolve the problem of unbalanced development between the south and the north by upgrading and merging counties and cities.
Some may argue that the increased budgets allotted to the upgraded counties and cities will promote local infrastructure and development as well as attract new residents, but my research shows that the budget allocations will not influence population distribution.
Regardless of politics, the entire county and city merger and upgrades plan betrays the government’s hasty, arbitrary and dictatorial streak in drawing up policies for national land-use planning. It is extremely risky that such an important guideline for national construction has not been publicly discussed and instead was decided by a few review committee members. Furthermore, it will have an impact on the lives of Taiwanese for the next several decades.
These few committee members decided on which counties and cities should be merged and upgraded within a short period, but they have not given the public a full and transparent explanation of their decision-making process.
Such a top-down approach to deciding important national policies, which completely ignores public opinion, does not conform to democratic procedures.
If this kind of decision were to bring about a positive outcome, it could only be attributed to pure luck. What can be anticipated is that the framework of three metropolises will remain the absurd wishful thinking of the government, as the population of Taiwan will continue to gravitate toward the Taipei metropolitan area.
Lai Shih-kung is a professor in the Department of Real Estate and Built Environment at National Taipei University.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
Pat Gelsinger took the reins as Intel CEO three years ago with hopes of reviving the US industrial icon. He soon made a big mistake. Intel had a sweet deal going with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the giant manufacturer of semiconductors for other companies. TSMC would make chips that Intel designed, but could not produce and was offering deep discounts to Intel, four people with knowledge of the agreement said. Instead of nurturing the relationship, Gelsinger — who hoped to restore Intel’s own manufacturing prowess — offended TSMC by calling out Taiwan’s precarious relations with China. “You don’t want all of
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
In a recent essay in Foreign Affairs, titled “The Upside on Uncertainty in Taiwan,” Johns Hopkins University professor James B. Steinberg makes the argument that the concept of strategic ambiguity has kept a tenuous peace across the Taiwan Strait. In his piece, Steinberg is primarily countering the arguments of Tufts University professor Sulmaan Wasif Khan, who in his thought-provoking new book The Struggle for Taiwan does some excellent out-of-the-box thinking looking at US policy toward Taiwan from 1943 on, and doing some fascinating “what if?” exercises. Reading through Steinberg’s comments, and just starting to read Khan’s book, we could already sense that
RSS