The global financial storm has had a severe impact on trade and the domestic market in Taiwan, which has suffered the worst unemployment figures and economic contraction of the Four Asian Tigers.
Figures show that excessive reliance on China is the major cause of Taiwan’s recession. Since the global financial crisis broke last year, China has suffered a grave decline in exports. But Taiwanese exports to China have suffered even more.
The signing of an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China may be beneficial to some Taiwanese industries, but it will not be beneficial to Taiwan’s economy as a whole.
Moreover, it is not realistic for Taiwan’s lackluster economy to rely on an economic pact with China and Chinese demand.
The logic of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration runs like this: As long as cross-strait policy liberalizes, then the nation’s economy is certain to grow and unemployment will fall to below 3 percent.
SPECIOUS
This is a specious assertion. In Taiwan, which has higher labor costs, it is far-fetched to claim that deregulation of economic trade across the Strait and an economic agreement with China will reduce unemployment.
Any form of economic integration has an impact on a country’s autonomy.
To date, the UK, Denmark and Sweden are still not willing to join the EU monetary union. However, the reality is that despite the enormous size of the eurozone as an economic entity, London has not been marginalized. Indeed, it remains the financial capital of the world.
This tells us that having an enormous economy as a neighbor does not necessarily make dependence the best policy.
If dependence leads to a nation losing its economic autonomy, then economic security and even national security will be under considerable threat. We should carefully consider this from the perspectives of local demand and long-term interest when reflecting on strategies for Taiwan’s economic autonomy.
If the government sincerely wanted to prevent Taiwan from being economically marginalized, it would not be promoting reliance on the Chinese market because China still has a low GDP.
Instead, the government should exclude China from industrial policy.
TECHNOLOGIES
Other countries that have attained the goal of an annual average per capita income of US$30,000 have not done so by being dependent on the Chinese market but by relying on technologies that they control and on industries and products with high added value.
Taiwan should adopt a new industrial mindset and abandon the East Asian manufacturing and export mode that emphasizes cost-cutting.
In addition, the government should gradually transfer the focus of national economic development from OEM industries that have long relied on inexpensive labor to export industries that make products with high added value and to domestic industries that improve living standards.
The government is sorely mistaken if it thinks that relying on the Chinese market will bring about its stated goals of annual GDP growth of 6 percent, annual per capita income of US$30,000 and an unemployment rate of less than 3 percent.
Chiou Jiunn-rong is a professor of economics and vice dean of the Management School at National Central University.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS