China has begun a concerted effort to keep its export economy humming, even as demand for its goods plummets with the global downturn.
Risking the ire of the US and other trading partners, the Chinese government has quietly started adopting policies aimed at encouraging exports while curbing imports, even though China, as one of the world’s largest exporters, has aggressively criticized protectionism in other countries.
The government has sharply expanded three programs to help exporters, giving them larger tax rebates, more generous loans from state-owned banks to finance trade and more government-paid travel to promote themselves at trade shows around the world.
At the same time, Beijing has banned all local, provincial and national government agencies from buying imported goods except in cases where no local substitute exists.
The rule, issued as part of the country’s economic stimulus plan and enforcing a seldom honored Chinese law from 2003 favoring domestic suppliers, exploits China’s failure so far to sign a global agreement barring protectionism in government procurement.
And in an effort to strengthen its own exporters, it is limiting how much of certain key raw materials can leave the country.
Ron Kirk, the US trade representative, announced on Tuesday that the US and the EU had filed a complaint with the WTO accusing China of limiting exports like bauxite and zinc, of which China is one of the world’s largest producers, to give an unfair advantage to Chinese manufacturers that use the materials.
“China is not only continuing but accelerating many of the protectionist approaches they’ve taken in the past to promote economic development,” said Michael Wessel, who was appointed by Nancy Pelosi, the speaker of the House of Representatives, to the United States-China Economic and Security Review Commission.
The policies could help ensure that China’s economy continues to grow, but at the risk of increasing global trade tensions at a sensitive time when more countries are resorting to administrative measures to restrict trade.
The policies also fly in the face of China’s own promises and incentives to build an economy based on domestic consumption as well as international exports.
“The focus on maintaining export competitiveness to prevent job losses is clearly trumping longer-term considerations of rebalancing growth and reducing reliance on exports,” Eswar Prasad, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington, said in an e-mail message. “But this is a dangerous strategy. Protectionist measures, both explicit and implicit, could be difficult to pull back.”
In other moves, Beijing has halted the rise of the yuan against the greenback by intervening heavily in currency markets, dumping billions in yuan and buying US dollars and other currencies.
Provincial governments also appear to have cut back on their enforcement of counterfeiting laws and other intellectual property protections. Chinese consumers have less need to buy imported goods when they can buy much less expensive copies manufactured locally.
In March, Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) announced that his country would rely on domestic consumption to keep the economy growing as exports shrank in the global downturn. The pronouncement was greeted with a mixture of delight and skepticism by economists and governments the world over, but the skeptics appear to have been vindicated.
Despite the havoc the global downturn has wreaked on export-driven economies — exports are down 45 percent in Japan — China’s exports to the US fell only 12.1 percent in the first four months of this year compared with the same period last year.
Over the same interval, US exports to China dropped 17.2 percent.
Yet the US trade deficit paradoxically narrowed to US$67 billion from US$75 billion for these periods. That was because trade is so lopsided that a shrinkage of overall trade results in a smaller deficit even when US exports drop faster.
The US imports more than US$4 worth of goods from China for every US$1 of goods that it exports to China.
Chinese officials and economists are quick to defend their country’s policies.
Yu Qiao (�?, an economist at Tsinghua University, said that China did not produce some kinds of equipment and would need to import them.
“I think there is room for foreign producers to take some shares of the stimulus package,” Yu said.
Taking just one example, Li Junfeng (李俊峰), an official at China’s top economic planning agency, said recent complaints from foreign wind turbine manufacturers about domestic purchasing rules were without merit. These manufacturers have factories in China and can use them to fill Chinese orders, he said.
Li also said many purchasing officials have a reflexive preference for foreign brands and fail to consider domestic alternatives.
Li’s agency, the National Development and Reform Commission, ordered on June 4 that government agencies buy only Chinese goods of all types with money from the government’s stimulus program. Yet early this year, China criticized a much narrower preference for US-made steel in US President Barack Obama’s economic stimulus plan.
Under the rules of the WTO, China is prohibited from discriminating by nationality in the purchasing of goods — except for government procurement, which is covered by a separate WTO agreement that virtually all industrialized nations have signed. When China joined the WTO in November 2001, gaining full access for its exports to foreign markets, it pledged to join the agreement on government procurement “as soon as possible.”
Subsequent talks in Geneva produced no progress, leaving China, with its enormous state sector, free to favor domestic firms in government contracting.
At the same time, the plunge last winter and this spring in Chinese exports has resulted in a shift by many Chinese factories from exports only to a shared reliance on export and domestic markets, said Merle Hinrichs, chairman and chief executive of Global Sources, a Hong Kong company that connects Chinese suppliers with Western buyers. These factories do not always pay licensing fees for patents that are transferred to them for exports but then used to supply the domestic market.
Richard Gould, the manager of southern China operations at CBI Consulting, a Shanghai-based investigative firm specializing in intellectual property, said cutbacks in enforcement of intellectual property laws stemmed in part from policies aimed at temporarily reducing the regulatory burden on Chinese businesses.
No reliable data are available on counterfeiting in China, however. Because it is illegal, companies do not report figures. The only estimates are based on the value of goods seized in police raids, and that value declines when the police conduct fewer raids.
Counterfeiters “have a very good sense of the legal system,” Gould said. “They really don’t think they’re going to be raided.”
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS