Minister of the Interior Liao Liou-yi (廖了以) recently announced that the merger of Tainan City and Tainan County had been postponed, but that the merger of Taichung and Kaohsiung counties and cities and the upgrade of Taipei County to a municipal city had been approved.
This seems to be an exciting political game, but it is as if lower-tier players in US professional baseball suddenly took up the opportunity to play in the Major Leagues, despite warnings from their coaches and managers about the risk to their reputation if they were completely outclassed.
While a player only has himself to blame for not being able to judge such a situation, managers can hardly be absolved over failing to perform their responsibilities.
Applying for a merger of a county and a city is a show put on by pan-blue and pan-green politicians. Instead of paying attention to the economy, living standards and other genuine problems, they are focusing on an unrealistic situation.
Politicians should know their limitations. Upgrading to a municipal city involves cultural and historical measures relating to local people.
Only when these foundations are secured will a city or county be able to increase its visibility.
Local governments must not ignore their foundations for superficial goals or waste social resources to pursue an unrealistic aim simply for political reasons.
There is nothing stopping mayors and county commissioners from conducting public polls to see if local residents want to upgrade their administrative status or if they prefer increased budget allocations in accordance with the Financial Income And Expenditures Compartmentalization Act (財政收支劃分法).
But if we look at the history of Taiwan and other countries, we learn that no place can have such a high number of “municipal cities.”
Based on this, it is easy to see which counties or cities simply want a piece of the action.
In addition, the history of the development of local governments shows that during the Qing Dynasty and under Japanese rule, they developed according to practical rather than political concerns.
These systems later became the foundation for local autonomy that was implemented by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government in which counties were divided into smaller units.
At the time, there were no complaints that local residents would become second-class citizens if their local government was not upgraded. This is because very few counties qualified to become special municipalities based on conditions at that time.
Moreover, it is strange that Chiayi and Yunlin counties have applied for a merger that leaves Chiayi City, the most important urban area in the region, out of the picture. During the Qing Dynasty, under Japanese rule and up to the present, Chiayi City has been the center of the Yunlin-Chiayi area.
Fortunately, that proposal was not approved by the review committee.
Chiayi City would end up like Berlin, an island in the former East Germany. Would this outcome really suit the development of Yunlin and Chiayi counties?
It was unwise of the central government to propose something so unrealistic for most cities and counties. It is even more annoying to see local officials trying to benefit from the process.
Wu Quen-tsai is an associate professor in the Department of History and Geography at National Chiayi University.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s