When China isolated itself — or was isolated — little information about the country or its people was accessible. At the time, US China experts were scarce as they needed to understand Chinese characters and to have studied Chinese history and culture for a few years to obtain a reasonable understanding of the Chinese situation.
After former US president Richard Nixon opened a channel to China, the number of US China experts shot up. Various professionals such as businesspeople, politicians, academics and journalists went to China and gained a superficial understanding of the country by listening to swaggering locals. These so-called China experts could be called the “fast food” experts.
The “fast food” school of China experts holds to a few dogmas. First, China has a vast territory and lots of people, so the US must not make an enemy of it. It also argues that China offers unlimited business opportunities and that once it rises, it will settle old scores. China’s long period of decline was based on nationalism and adventurism abroad. Therefore, the belief goes, the US cannot afford to provoke China and instead must accommodate the Chinese government on all matters.
FRAGILE
During the administration of former US president Bill Clinton, Clark Randt, former US ambassador to China, worried about a Chinese collapse because of the impact a flood of Chinese refugees would have on Southeast Asia. In the same vein, in her 2007 book China: Fragile Superpower, former US deputy assistant secretary of state Susan Shirk revealed a similar attitude: China’s weakness had led to insecurity among the Chinese leadership and this could lead to the use of force against Taiwan in an attempt to fan nationalism to secure power.
Shirk’s book sees through China and its tricks and addresses China’s serious internal problems in an objective manner by saying that China is “externally strong but internally weak.” However, for commercial purposes, she made alarming statements in the first chapter of her book, saying that if China was strong, Taiwan would be in danger and that if China was weak, Taiwan would still be in danger.
Although she did not want to appear impetuous on political matters because of concerns for book sales in Taiwan, she asserted that economic integration with China would be beneficial to the majority of Taiwanese and that “it will reduce the obstacles facing Taiwan’s security.”
NORMALIZED
There is no question that economic exchanges between Taiwan and China should be normalized. But if integration means political compromise on Taiwan’s sovereignty and annexation by China, then how could it reduce Taiwan’s security problem? Ever since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took office, Chinese military invasion has not been one of Taiwan’s security problems: The problem has been the “peaceful annexation” of Taiwan by China.
Those US China experts should change the way they think.
Neither China’s peaceful rise nor collapse is a bad thing since such an anti-humanistic regime as China’s should be overthrown at any rate. If the Chinese leadership wanted to engage in an external adventure to distract attention from its serious internal situation, it would dig its own grave. Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) is not as stupid as those experts think.
James Wang is a senior media commentator.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS