After coming under considerable criticism, the Ministry of Education on Tuesday decided to cut NT$240 million (US$7.3 million) from its NT$1.2 billion “Taiwan Has Taste” campaign that aims to cultivate good moral character and an appreciation of art.
The Ministry of Education may have good intentions but the question is: Can morals and taste be cultivated by spending money?
Judging by the NT$800,000 in taxpayer dollars spent by the ministry on the campaign’s launch alone, odds are that the campaign will turn out to be nothing more than a slogan, an image-builder for the government among conservatives and an open-ended stage for President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to lecture on virtue.
Ma promised that “the campaign will become a new life movement ... that prizes moral values, quality of work and fine taste.”
Ma told the audience at the campaign launch that his guiding principle since childhood had been to “engage people with sincerity, and work with devotion and diligence (誠以待人，敬以治事).”
He said the motto embodied the goals of the “Taiwan Has Taste” campaign and expressed the hope that everyone would incorporate the spirit of the saying in all aspects of their daily lives.
It is ironic to hear the president preach on sincerity given that he hasn’t exactly been leading by example.
Back in 1998, Ma said numerous times that he would not run for Taipei mayor, only to backtrack and run — not once, but twice — as the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate.
This month, Ma — true to form — announced his bid to run for the KMT chairmanship, despite a pledge made last year that he would not run for the position if he were elected president.
Thus, a president with a rather unimpressive record of commitment to public pronouncements is now asking the public to buy into the government’s virtue-packed “Taiwan Has Taste” campaign.
If Ma, as head of state, were to start leading his government officials by example by exercising honesty, genuineness and compassion, their daily conduct might exert a much greater influence on members of the public through earning their respect and trust, and best of all, not a dime would need to be spent.
That way, the planned NT$960 million to be allocated by the Ministry of the Education could be better spent elsewhere, for example, on students who can’t afford the lunch meal program; on people who are unable to pay their health insurance; or on creating programs that better serve the needs of the nation’s growing number of unemployed.
What a shame that the president doesn’t seem to understand that Taiwanese know full well what “good character” means, both literally (in real life) and in the cynical sense employed in this campaign — and do not need to be told how to behave.
A good number of Taiwanese will also conclude that Ma’s campaign is inspired by the New Life Movement launched by the Nationalist government in pre-World War II China, whose chief advocate was Soong Mayling (宋美齡) herself (presumably husband Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) was too busy exterminating foes to be bothered with a war against spitting).
In “virtue” and “character,” as in so many other things, Ma is living in a world long gone, oblivious to the patronizing tone of his language and nostalgia.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS