Should we continue to practice medicine and heal bodies if Taiwan participates in the WHO as part of China — at the risk of losing our identity as a Taiwanese nation?
Or should we fight to keep our soul as a nation and boycott the current administration’s move to incorporate Taiwan in the WHO as a province of China?
This is the critical dilemma we now face.
It is difficult. It is painful. How can we turn our backs on the Hippocratic Oath in order to salvage a heritage that gave us life, meaning and purpose?
For so long now, Taiwanese physicians have fought hard for Taiwan to be recognized as a sovereign nation by the WHO, but these efforts have failed.
But the WHO has recognized neither our status as a sovereign nation nor our sublime responsibility as physicians.
ARRANGEMENT
Yet recent developments have demonstrated that the pro-China administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) managed to broker an arrangement with WHO officials and the Chinese government that allows participation from Taiwan’s representatives only under the umbrella of China.
We are thus given the choice of healing bodies if we lose our Taiwanese souls.
Something is not right about this picture. Why must we succumb to such a sacrifice when we are perfectly able to practice the sublime act of healing while keeping our sovereignty and unalienable rights as Taiwanese?
We should first ask the Ma administration and the WHO’s policymakers about the rationale for Taiwan’s acceptance this year.
We should scrutinize not only the decision but also, and more importantly, the process that led to it.
We must ask that any deals cut by the Ma administration and China be revealed. We must request these parties to make it transparently clear what concessions were made in order to bring about acceptance by the WHO.
What price will we pay just to have been a participant at this year’s World Health Assembly?
VALUE
The most important implication is what follows from being recognized by the WHO as a province of China. What value can be attached to our participation and contributions if we are treated no differently than physician representatives from Hong Kong, Guangdong or Sichuan?
We should not settle for anything less. We should not allow anyone to blackmail us and strip away our identity.
Our profession is noble and sublime, but we are more than what we do.
Who we are and what we do are not the same. What good are our accomplishments if we cannot find meaning in who we are? “For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?” (Mark 8:37)
We can still find fulfillment in healing patients even if we are outside the realm of the WHO. We can still affirm our value by believing in what we practice and practicing what we believe.
But what is the value of our existence if our spirit is broken and if our soul as a nation is not valued and accepted?
Acceptance by the WHO as a province of China and not as Taiwan does not constitute acceptance.
Let us therefore unite. Let us demand the truth. Let us expose and bring to light the inequality we suffer. Let us fight for Taiwan with all our body and soul.
Julin F. Tang is a professor in the School of Medicine at University of California, San Francisco.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS