Should we continue to practice medicine and heal bodies if Taiwan participates in the WHO as part of China — at the risk of losing our identity as a Taiwanese nation?
Or should we fight to keep our soul as a nation and boycott the current administration’s move to incorporate Taiwan in the WHO as a province of China?
This is the critical dilemma we now face.
It is difficult. It is painful. How can we turn our backs on the Hippocratic Oath in order to salvage a heritage that gave us life, meaning and purpose?
For so long now, Taiwanese physicians have fought hard for Taiwan to be recognized as a sovereign nation by the WHO, but these efforts have failed.
But the WHO has recognized neither our status as a sovereign nation nor our sublime responsibility as physicians.
ARRANGEMENT
Yet recent developments have demonstrated that the pro-China administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) managed to broker an arrangement with WHO officials and the Chinese government that allows participation from Taiwan’s representatives only under the umbrella of China.
We are thus given the choice of healing bodies if we lose our Taiwanese souls.
Something is not right about this picture. Why must we succumb to such a sacrifice when we are perfectly able to practice the sublime act of healing while keeping our sovereignty and unalienable rights as Taiwanese?
We should first ask the Ma administration and the WHO’s policymakers about the rationale for Taiwan’s acceptance this year.
We should scrutinize not only the decision but also, and more importantly, the process that led to it.
We must ask that any deals cut by the Ma administration and China be revealed. We must request these parties to make it transparently clear what concessions were made in order to bring about acceptance by the WHO.
What price will we pay just to have been a participant at this year’s World Health Assembly?
VALUE
The most important implication is what follows from being recognized by the WHO as a province of China. What value can be attached to our participation and contributions if we are treated no differently than physician representatives from Hong Kong, Guangdong or Sichuan?
We should not settle for anything less. We should not allow anyone to blackmail us and strip away our identity.
Our profession is noble and sublime, but we are more than what we do.
Who we are and what we do are not the same. What good are our accomplishments if we cannot find meaning in who we are? “For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?” (Mark 8:37)
We can still find fulfillment in healing patients even if we are outside the realm of the WHO. We can still affirm our value by believing in what we practice and practicing what we believe.
But what is the value of our existence if our spirit is broken and if our soul as a nation is not valued and accepted?
Acceptance by the WHO as a province of China and not as Taiwan does not constitute acceptance.
Let us therefore unite. Let us demand the truth. Let us expose and bring to light the inequality we suffer. Let us fight for Taiwan with all our body and soul.
Julin F. Tang is a professor in the School of Medicine at University of California, San Francisco.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS