Ignoring traditional culture
I have to say that, while your competition’s bold all-caps headlines are eye catching, I’ve remained loyal to the Taipei Times for your generally balanced take on Taiwan’s developments.
This opinion is also set forth in your own 10-year anniversary ads, where you claim to be “the nation’s most reliable and comprehensive” newspaper, with “the inside scoop on the arts,” and on those “whose contributions to society deserve to be recorded.”
Apparently, Taiwan’s musicians and producers in the field of traditional arts and culture do not meet your criteria, as the nation’s prime music awards ceremony for traditional arts and culture earned nary a drop of your ink.
Or perhaps you were unaware that the Government Information Office has divided the 20th annual Golden Melody Awards into two ceremonies — an upcoming one for pop, and the other for traditional arts and culture, which came and went on June 6, at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hall.
In my opinion, this splitting of the awards was newsworthy in itself.
Why was traditional arts and culture segregated from what most would describe as the main event? Is it because traditional arts and culture are deemed to be of little interest? Or were there other motivations?
Whatever the case, we should care. And more importantly, you should have reported this.
A stroll through your pages on any given day reveals a growing concern that Taiwanese culture is being sidelined in favor of mainstream — and Chinese — interests. So how could this development, and this event, have gone unnoticed?
Taiwan’s cultures are struggling to survive, with many facing the risk of becoming extinct. Hokklo (also known as Taiwanese) and Hakka cultures are in decline, and UNESCO rates every Aboriginal language in Taiwan as either in danger of extinction or already extinct.
With music at the heart of tradition culture, a failure to support traditional and cultural music can only aggravate the problem.
As a three-time nominee at this year’s awards (for best arranger, cross-over album and producer), I would have appreciated not only coverage of the awards, but a solid critique, as well. Many felt the performances did not do justice to Taiwan’s traditional cultures, and only by critiquing such events can we hope to improve on them in the future.
But by not reporting at all, you only serve to confirm the likely justification for segregating and marginalizing traditional arts and culture — that nobody really cares.
Indeed, if the Taipei Times — our great bastion of local culture — doesn’t deem traditional and cultural music to be newsworthy, then who should? And I suppose, from a reporting perspective, pop has so much more to offer.
Your very own “Pop Stop” was right on top of this year’s POP-ular Golden Melody news, reporting that Jay Chou (周杰倫) has eight nominations, while Wang Lee-hom (王力宏) has secured two nominations.
Reading on, I learned that for his birthday, Wang purchased a used car, which the Environmental Protection Administration says “spews out 35 times more in pollutants than a new car.”
Now that is newsworthy.
Reading a little further, I learned that Jolin Tsai (蔡依林) “showed off her sexy moves” in a concert with Singaporean Stefanie Sun (孫燕姿), who dressed up as “a lobster-red creature from outer space” and “promised to fix Tsai up with some male action.”
On the other hand, those bold caps headlines are starting to look a little more appealing.
MATTHEW LIEN
Taipei
Preserving our heritage
After reading the report on President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) hope that an agreement could be reached with Beijing on teaching overseas compatriots to read traditional characters and write simplified characters (“Ma calls for agreement on use of traditional Chinese,” June 10, page 1), I have something to share.
This proposal contradicts Ma’s stated devotion to the preservation of traditional Chinese characters.
No other writing system in the world has remained unchanged for thousands of years. The ability to understand traditional characters allows one to appreciate ancient Chinese literary works. Traditional Chinese characters are undoubtedly one of the most important forms of cultural heritage in the world. That is why Ma wants to preserve them. However, the path he is taking might be the wrong one.
If Ma really wants to preserve this heritage, he should urge people to write traditional characters. It’s always easier for people to preserve something when it is used every day. That is also one of the reasons that local languages such as Hoklo, Hakka and Aboriginal tongues are now taught in elementary school. Similarly, traditional characters should be promoted overseas. They can be preserved more easily if they are used by a larger number of people.
Being able to read traditional characters is not enough. If a learner of English as a second language can easily read English books but can’t spell one word, is he a successful learner? No. So being able to read but not to write traditional characters can’t be counted as understanding traditional characters either.
Perhaps because of the political and economic dominance of China in recent years, simplified characters have become the mainstream.
However, I do hope that Ma will make a bigger effort to preserve such a beautiful and precious heritage.
CHEN CHUN-CHU
Changhua
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS