Cohen was ‘bang-on’
Jerome Cohen’s recent comments about the weakness of Taiwan’s legal academics and the inaction of members of a supposedly independent judiciary come at a time of growing evidence of the return of the party-state and a rise in police harassment of those who would choose to visibly protest against President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his administration (“NYU professor criticizes legal profession’s silence,” June 13, page 1).
The biggest threats currently facing Taiwan are not the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), nor their post-2005 shared unification agenda, but rather public apathy and indifference, which have caused substantial damage to Taiwan’s ability to conduct its own affairs.
When even a small minority of Taiwanese put their personal profit, fatalism or fear of reprisal before a collective requirement to defend the nation’s economic and political sovereignty, democracy and the rule of law, it makes it far easier for external forces to harm Taiwan’s development and restrict the freedom of its people. The fact that the president and the legislature are in the hands of a party that panders primarily to the China-centric aspirations of between 6 percent and 12 percent of the population, speaks constitutionally but fails to act so and which cannot accept public consensus on identification with Taiwan as a country, portends great and unsettling changes, the full severity and impact of which may not become apparent to Taiwanese until it is too late.
It will take more than 600,000 people protesting on one weekend to make this government respect Taiwan as a country and its people. If Ma is able to ignore four major protests against him in just one year and revise history at will, if police can break the law with impunity and get promoted and if the judiciary and prosecutors are just tools for political vendettas, then what is the future of this democracy, its de facto independence and the right of the Taiwanese to manage their own affairs?
The tragedy of the early years of the Republic of China (ROC) is that Chinese were not united behind the new country and many used this lack of consensus to enrich or protect their own familial and financial interests. Thus the nation ultimately collapsed into civil war, which came at a tremendous cost to Chinese.
Let us hope that Taiwanese will learn from history and prevent this from happening in their country, but I am not optimistic. Perhaps this is, after all, just the “tragedy of the commons.”
Cohen was spot on with his analysis of Taiwan’s precarious state. If Taiwanese keep putting “pragmatism” and “win-win” before the very principles of democracy and rule of law that serve as the foundation of a sovereign constitutional order and cohesive society, they will lose every gain in self-determination that so many have fought and died for in the last 400 years of colonial occupation.
Only when the KMT accepts Taiwan as its only territory, or when the ROC finally goes home, will Taiwanese be safe from the forces — internal and external — that seek to subjugate them politically, economically and culturally.
BEN GOREN
Taichung
Tackling alcohol abuse
The frightening statistics on domestic violence recently reported on by your paper (“Domestic violence continues behind closed doors,” June 7, page 3) call for adequate government measures to address the problem.
The report discussed a significant and urgent issue: Whether alcohol-abusing parents should be required to undergo treatment. People often neglect the fact that children who have alcohol-abusing parents live in an environment that is as risky as those with drug-addicted parents. Drunken parents often cannot control their emotions and vent their anger on their partner and children. Unfortunately, unlike drug-abusing parents, alcoholic parents are not required to undergo treatment. Such a loophole might lead to serious domestic violence, causing irreparable harm to families.
I am one of the victims.
I have always been haunted by the memory of my alcoholic father. When I was a teenager, I witnessed how my drunken father shouted, cursed, smashed bottles, destroyed furniture and threatened us. I saw him abuse my mother both mentally and physically, but I could do nothing. His abusive behavior led to countless nightmares.
My case, however, is just the tip of the iceberg. On TV news or in newspapers, we often hear about horrible cases of domestic violence where family members are seriously injured by an alcoholic parent. Some of the victims even lose their lives.
If we keep neglecting the loophole and allow the problem to intensify, abused children and wives will live in a state of perpetual danger. Alcoholic parents should be required to undergo treatment and legal protection must be provided by the government.
HUANG YU-WEN
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS