Disregarding derision from several quarters, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has pushed out Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) to force his way into the KMT chairmanship.
Ma’s decision attracted criticism throughout the pan-green camp and also caused a considerable backlash in the pan-blue camp over concerns that he might centralize power — but he could not care less.
Despite the fact that former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) all concurrently held the chairmanship of their parties at some time, the phenomenon runs counter to the spirit of democratic constitutionalism.
In accordance with the division of powers in a democratic constitutional government, the president of a democracy should not concurrently serve as a party chairman who has actual power.
Although the US president is an acting party chairman, the affiliations of US political parties are loosely formed and do not feature fixed members or strict party discipline, nor can they put restraints on congressional members whose role it is to supervise the president.
This is not the case here. Most Taiwanese parties are quite rigidly structured; a party chairman, for example, can nominate legislators — and legislators-at-large in particular. If the president doubles as party chair, the separation of powers under a presidential system devolves, as does the legitimacy created by separate elections for the presidency and the legislature.
In a semi-presidential system, the president holds real power but serves as a non-partisan protector of the constitutional order and an arbitrator amid partisan and political conflict. Thus, the president should not assume the role of party chairman. This is the reason why, as soon as a president of France is sworn in, he must vacate his party posts.
In a democracy, the Cabinet and the legislature do not necessarily have to be separate, so if Ma feels that the executive and legislative branches are not fully cooperating with him, then he should change the system of government by amending the Constitution and introducing a parliamentary system rather than sticking with the semi-presidential system and doubling as party chairman.
He could then lead legislators directly in his capacity as party chairman and as parliamentary leader without concerns over the separation of powers.
Rather than saying Ma’s unimpressive political performance is a result of the uncooperativeness of various ministries, it would be more correct to say that this is more a problem of policy. If he does not solve the problem at the source, destroying the spirit of democratic constitutionalism by doubling as party chairman will not be much help.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) should, of course, harshly criticize Ma, but it should also remember that it amended its party charter to allow Chen to double as party chairman. Before calling for a constitutional interpretation by the Council of Grand Justices, the DPP should admit to its mistakes.
Lin Cho-shui is a former Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means