The temptation to prop the nipper in front of Teletubbies and finally read Saturday’s paper on Wednesday is both understandable and, if the alternative is screaming at the little lovely out of exhaustion, probably preferable. But the truth is that few of us parents are aware of just how bad television is for their brain — too much is like feeding them mental uranium.
When boys are followed from birth until they are men, even after taking account of the other main causes of violence, like being beaten up or neglected, how much TV and how violent the content they watched as children remains an independent cause of how violent they are as adults.
Television makes us fat yet it also leads to self-starvation and throwing up food. Fiji did not have TV until 1995 and the women favored a full figure. Not a single case of bulimia had ever been recorded there but within three years of the arrival of TV, 11 percent of young Fijian women were suffering. They were three times more likely to have developed the illness if they lived in a home with a TV.
Equally, TV causes obesity by increasing torpid inactivity, advertising fatty foods and increased eating while watching. Conclusive proof came from introduction of TV in China, previously a thin population. Among 10,000 Chinese, the more they watched, the fatter they were. For every extra hour watched, the greater the likelihood of obesity.
It damages health in other ways. A 26-year study of 1,000 children showed that those who watched more than two hours a day between five and 15 were significantly unhealthier years later. Even after allowing for other factors, like social class and parents’ habits, they were significantly more at risk of high cholesterol, smoking and unfitness as a direct result of their greater TV watching when young.
TV impairs children’s concentration. For every extra hour a day watched, a child is 9 percent more likely to have attentional difficulties (the core problem in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder). To maximize the impact, there are shorter scenes: a study of the pace and editing speed in Sesame Street showed that they had doubled over a 26-year period. The duration of a typical US public service broadcast scene is 70 percent longer than one in a commercial children’s TV show.
By fast-forwarding life into a concentrated rush of exciting events, TV corrupts children’s expectations. Key reward chemicals are secreted and when the off button is pushed and they go to a school lesson, it’s happening too slowly to maintain their interest: they want more, bigger snacks — now.
Children who watch a lot of TV before the age of three learn to fail academically: subsequent scores on math, reading and comprehension are worse and their exam results are worse when recorded at age 26.
Knowing all this should make you take serious heed of the advice that children should watch no more than one hour a day. Yet the terrifying fact is that the average six-year-old has already spent more than one full year of its life watching TV. Half of three-year-olds have a TV set in their room.
Health officials should be mounting massive campaigns to persuade us to watch less but that is unlikely to occur.
So even if you are unable stop watching TV yourself, today needs to be the first one in which your child only gets to spend an hour watching — and it needs to stay that way.
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
After the coup in Burma in 2021, the country’s decades-long armed conflict escalated into a full-scale war. On one side was the Burmese army; large, well-equipped, and funded by China, supported with weapons, including airplanes and helicopters from China and Russia. On the other side were the pro-democracy forces, composed of countless small ethnic resistance armies. The military junta cut off electricity, phone and cell service, and the Internet in most of the country, leaving resistance forces isolated from the outside world and making it difficult for the various armies to coordinate with one another. Despite being severely outnumbered and
After the confrontation between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy on Friday last week, John Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser, discussed this shocking event in an interview. Describing it as a disaster “not only for Ukraine, but also for the US,” Bolton added: “If I were in Taiwan, I would be very worried right now.” Indeed, Taiwanese have been observing — and discussing — this jarring clash as a foreboding signal. Pro-China commentators largely view it as further evidence that the US is an unreliable ally and that Taiwan would be better off integrating more deeply into
RSS