Taiwan is multi-racial
Taiwan is a multi-racial society and Taiwanese of all races have the right to speak the national languages. Those who come to live in Taiwan and refuse to speak a word of Taiwanese, Mandarin or any of the national languages are egocentrics.
Despite being Taiwanese citizens, my children, because of their racial features, are pointed at, pinched, heckled, have obscenities barked at them in English, racial slurs yelled at them in Mandarin and Hoklo (also known as Taiwanese), and as Martin de Jonge described so eloquently (Letters, June 2, page 8), are treated as zoo animals on a daily basis.
A simple trip to the supermarket can be a nightmare because some people (and I stress, only some) will not leave us alone. Such acts are considered assault, harassment, and/or racist attacks in other countries. My wife and I do our best to tolerate it, but this does not make it right.
Last summer, my sister-in-law went to my sons’ supposedly “bilingual” kindergarten and saw our then four-year-old standing to attention in the courtyard in the hot, midday sun, tears streaming down his face. His aunt asked the school what he had done and we eventually got to the bottom of what had happened: He was being used as a marketing tool for the school because of his racial features.
As apparently was routine, when prospective parents arrived that day during nap-time, he was woken up and asked to speak with the parents, who were told he was a “foreigner.” He balked and spoke Mandarin, embarrassing the school, and was punished. Needless to say, my boys are now home-schooled.
But there is hope. Just today my sons started playing with a boy and his sister at the swimming pool. After the boy went to whisper something to his mother, his mother smiled and I heard her answer in Mandarin: “Sure their hair and eyes and skin are different, but they are people just like us. You can play with them.”
They then played happily together, speaking Mandarin and bits of Taiwanese and English as probably many Taiwanese children their age do.
MATTHEW LIAO
Taichung
Ma no fan of democracy
In his June 4 op-ed piece, “Bullets over Beijing,” in the New York Times, Nicholas Kristof recounts how 20 years earlier he stood at the northwest corner of Tiananmen Square and watched as Chinese troops opened fire and slaughtered hundreds of unarmed students.
In Kristof’s account, everyone was terrified and no one dared to help the injured, who writhed in pain in the 100m space that separated the crowd from the soldiers.
At the end of his article, Kristof writes this paragraph: “In Taiwan in 1986, an ambitious young official named Ma Ying-jeou [馬英九] used to tell me that robust Western-style democracy might not be fully suited for the people of Taiwan. He revised his view and now is the island’s democratically elected president.”
That Ma has always been ambitious is incontrovertible. In fact, he now seems to have his sights set on holding the post of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman while simultaneously serving as president.
In addition, Ma was indeed democratically elected to the presidency, winning by a substantial margin.
But Kristof is wrong when he purports that Ma has “revised” his stance on democracy. There is absolutely nothing in Ma’s political record to indicate that he has revised his view even slightly.
There is no evidence that Ma has had a change of heart in regard to the suitability of democracy for Taiwanese.
On the contrary, his actions would seem to indicate that he has hardened his heart and even developed a hostility toward democracy and human rights.
MICHAEL SCANLON
East Hartford, Connecticut
After nine days of holidays for the Lunar New Year, government agencies and companies are to reopen for operations today, including the Legislative Yuan. Many civic groups are expected to submit their recall petitions this week, aimed at removing many Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers from their seats. Since December last year, the KMT and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed three controversial bills to paralyze the Constitutional Court, alter budgetary allocations and make recalling elected officials more difficult by raising the threshold. The amendments aroused public concern and discontent, sparking calls to recall KMT legislators. After KMT and TPP legislators again
Taiwan faces complex challenges like other Asia-Pacific nations, including demographic decline, income inequality and climate change. In fact, its challenges might be even more pressing. The nation struggles with rising income inequality, declining birthrates and soaring housing costs while simultaneously navigating intensifying global competition among major powers. To remain competitive in the global talent market, Taiwan has been working to create a more welcoming environment and legal framework for foreign professionals. One of the most significant steps in this direction was the enactment of the Act for the Recruitment and Employment of Foreign Professionals (外國專業人才延攬及僱用法) in 2018. Subsequent amendments in
US President Donald Trump on Saturday signed orders to impose tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China effective from today. Trump decided to slap 25 percent tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada as well as 10 percent on those coming from China, but would only impose a 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy products, including oil and electricity. Canada and Mexico on Sunday quickly responded with retaliatory tariffs against the US, while countermeasures from China are expected soon. Nevertheless, Trump announced yesterday to delay tariffs on Mexico and Canada for a month and said he would hold further talks with
Taiwan’s undersea cables connecting it to the world were allegedly severed several times by a Chinese ship registered under a flag of convenience. As the vessel sailed, it used several different automatic identification systems (AIS) to create fake routes. That type of “shadow fleet” and “gray zone” tactics could create a security crisis in Taiwan and warrants response measures. The concept of a shadow fleet originates from the research of Elisabeth Braw, senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council. The phenomenon was initiated by authoritarian countries such as Iran, North Korea and Russia, which have been hit by international economic
RSS