Before approving Want Want Group’s (旺旺集團) managerial takeover of China Television Co (CTV, 中視) and CTiTV(中天電視), the National Communications Commission (NCC) held hearings amid great fanfare, during which experts and academics almost unanimously opposed Want Want’s plans. Their concerns focused on the risk that the group could monopolize domestic media. Yet the NCC approved the proposal, disregarding the potential ramifications of a monopoly spanning newspapers, cable and terrestrial TV.
The NCC’s move threatens to put media under the control of politicians, special interest groups and corporations and undermine its supervisory role of the fourth estate.
The NCC should not have approved this deal spanning different media.
Although provisions were imposed on the takeover ostensibly to prevent a media monopoly from forming, upon closer examination, these conditions place no legal constraints on CTV and CTiTV. In fact, they could already have been met and the NCC would not know because it does not have the power to investigate whether this is the case.
At the same time, there are numerous ways to get around the rules, so there is no way that the NCC could stop a media monopoly.
A proposal that should never have been allowed has been approved by the NCC in a roundabout way.
Furthermore, the Want Want Group made wide use of its print media outlets to accuse the NCC of abusing its authority for tacking conditions onto the approval and then used its cable and terrestrial TV stations to broadcast reports that gave the impression that the NCC had dealt with CTV and CTiTV unfairly.
The NCC ended up making concessions by changing some of the conditions it set for CTV and CTiTV to suggestions rather than criteria.
Media outlets can run editorials and print news reports and ads to defend themselves when their own interests are at stake, but when media outlets become a tool for huge corporations trying to protect their interests the result is nothing short of scandalous.
From now on, we will find that CTiTV, CTV and the China Times will join forces in lashing out at anything that runs counter to the interests of the Want Want Group. This article may soon elicit criticism from these media outlets as well.
Since Taiwan is a diverse democracy, a media monopoly runs counter to public interests. The NCC should not have compromised on its conditions.
Yeh Yi-jin is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
As an American living in Taiwan, I have to confess how impressed I have been over the years by the Chinese Communist Party’s wholehearted embrace of high-speed rail and electric vehicles, and this at a time when my own democratic country has chosen a leader openly committed to doing everything in his power to put obstacles in the way of sustainable energy across the board — and democracy to boot. It really does make me wonder: “Are those of us right who hold that democracy is the right way to go?” Has Taiwan made the wrong choice? Many in China obviously
About 6.1 million couples tied the knot last year, down from 7.28 million in 2023 — a drop of more than 20 percent, data from the Chinese Ministry of Civil Affairs showed. That is more serious than the precipitous drop of 12.2 percent in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. As the saying goes, a single leaf reveals an entire autumn. The decline in marriages reveals problems in China’s economic development, painting a dismal picture of the nation’s future. A giant question mark hangs over economic data that Beijing releases due to a lack of clarity, freedom of the press
US President Donald Trump last week announced plans to impose reciprocal tariffs on eight countries. As Taiwan, a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, is among them, the policy would significantly affect the country. In response, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) dispatched two officials to the US for negotiations, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) board of directors convened its first-ever meeting in the US. Those developments highlight how the US’ unstable trade policies are posing a growing threat to Taiwan. Can the US truly gain an advantage in chip manufacturing by reversing trade liberalization? Is it realistic to
RSS