Is the new strain of influenza that has hit all corners of the globe in recent weeks a flu pandemic? It is difficult to know because the WHO has yet to offer a definitive answer. However, the WHO’s classification of the A(H1N1) outbreak as a Phase 5 outbreak is wrong.
A Phase 5 alert “is characterized by human-to-human spread of the virus into at least two countries in one WHO region.”
The WHO classifies the world into six regions, namely Africa, the Americas, Europe, the Eastern Mediterranean, Southeast Asia and the Western Pacific.
The highest possible pandemic alert is Phase 6, which “is characterized by community level outbreaks in at least one other country in a different WHO region in addition to the criteria defined in Phase 5,” or, in other words, a “global flu pandemic.”
Japan, which is part of the Western Pacific region, and the UK, part of the European region, experienced serious community-level outbreaks some time ago, with hundreds of people infected.
Strangely enough, even after news of the tranmissions in those two countries started spreading, the WHO did not raise the influenza pandemic alert to Phase 6.
The reason is that last week, countries such as the UK and Japan determined that the latest flu strain was weak, causing only mild symptoms, and that the WHO should therefore not raise the alarm to Phase 6.
The problem lies in the plans that these countries have implemented for pandemics. These plans are designed to prepare for the worst and treat any outbreak as extremely serious to gain immediate control of the situation. In other words, as soon as the WHO announces a Phase 6 influenza pandemic alert, these countries must immediately dispense their stocks of Tamiflu and other drugs to all citizens, close all schools and other public places and immediately develop a vaccine.
If the WHO were to announce a Phase 6 influenza pandemic alert, the economic activity of these countries would suffer. Such an announcement would also interfere with the operations of their medical systems, inconvenience the public and cause widespread panic. This is too high a price to pay for a flu of relatively weak virulence.
It would be a waste of valuable Tamiflu stocks and other anti-flu drugs if they were used for the current epidemic. This could also result in the emergence of drug-resistant flu strains in those countries. Depleting anti-flu stocks for a mild epidemic could be problematic if a more virulent strain were to emerge in autumn or winter.
It is worth asking ourselves whether considerations such as these are behind the WHO’s decision not to announce a Phase 6 influenza pandemic alert.
The WHO has said that the latest outbreak is an “unpredictable flu,” ostensibly to defend itself against ridicule. In addition, the WHO has taken many other actions of questionable value.
For example, the organization stopped insisting on naming the virus “swine flu” and changed its designation to A(H1NI) after being pressured by the world’s largest pork exporters.
To please China, meanwhile, it has listed information on A(H1N1) infections in Taiwan under China.
The WHO is no longer a non-biased health organization that cares for universal values, Rather, it appears to have turned into a political body.
Liou Pei-pai is the former director of the Taiwan Animal Health Research Institute.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Trying to force a partnership between Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and Intel Corp would be a wildly complex ordeal. Already, the reported request from the Trump administration for TSMC to take a controlling stake in Intel’s US factories is facing valid questions about feasibility from all sides. Washington would likely not support a foreign company operating Intel’s domestic factories, Reuters reported — just look at how that is going over in the steel sector. Meanwhile, many in Taiwan are concerned about the company being forced to transfer its bleeding-edge tech capabilities and give up its strategic advantage. This is especially
US President Donald Trump’s second administration has gotten off to a fast start with a blizzard of initiatives focused on domestic commitments made during his campaign. His tariff-based approach to re-ordering global trade in a manner more favorable to the United States appears to be in its infancy, but the significant scale and scope are undeniable. That said, while China looms largest on the list of national security challenges, to date we have heard little from the administration, bar the 10 percent tariffs directed at China, on specific priorities vis-a-vis China. The Congressional hearings for President Trump’s cabinet have, so far,
US political scientist Francis Fukuyama, during an interview with the UK’s Times Radio, reacted to US President Donald Trump’s overturning of decades of US foreign policy by saying that “the chance for serious instability is very great.” That is something of an understatement. Fukuyama said that Trump’s apparent moves to expand US territory and that he “seems to be actively siding with” authoritarian states is concerning, not just for Europe, but also for Taiwan. He said that “if I were China I would see this as a golden opportunity” to annex Taiwan, and that every European country needs to think
For years, the use of insecure smart home appliances and other Internet-connected devices has resulted in personal data leaks. Many smart devices require users’ location, contact details or access to cameras and microphones to set up, which expose people’s personal information, but are unnecessary to use the product. As a result, data breaches and security incidents continue to emerge worldwide through smartphone apps, smart speakers, TVs, air fryers and robot vacuums. Last week, another major data breach was added to the list: Mars Hydro, a Chinese company that makes Internet of Things (IoT) devices such as LED grow lights and the
RSS