While receiving Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) on Sunday, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) praised communication between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), supporting a continued role for talks between the two parties in cross-strait relations.
At the same time, he deflected potential criticism that promoting a party-to-party platform to improve government-to-government relations smacks of a one-party state.
This he did by portraying talks between the KMT and the CCP as complementary — with limited powers — to negotiations between the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) and the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS).
“Today, political parties can no longer dictate government policies,” Ma said, even as the KMT chairman prepared to embark on an eight-day visit to China.
The KMT was fulfilling a “responsibility,” the president said, encouraging the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to do the same following a visit to China by Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chu (陳菊), the most prominent DPP figure to cross the Strait in an official capacity.
Ma’s remarks were carefully weighed. They were an acknowledgment of public fears that the party-to-party platform may influence national concerns, which would be inappropriate for a non-transparent, non-governmental mechanism.
At the same time, Ma’s comments may have been intended to allay concerns within his party that he might reduce the scope of KMT-CCP communication.
Wu headed to China on Sunday amid speculation that Ma is unhappy with occasional differences — even friction — between his administration and the KMT headquarters and caucus.
During the KMT’s years in opposition, party-to-party talks were the KMT’s only channel for influencing cross-strait developments.
Having regained the presidency, however, the continuation of KMT-CCP talks outside SEF-ARATS negotiations, as well as the potential for disunity in the agendas pursued through the two channels, has fueled speculation that Ma is eyeing Wu’s place at the head of the KMT.
Indeed, Ma is faced with a balancing act that would make pursuing the KMT chairmanship a logical option.
With no sign that KMT-CCP talks will cease anytime soon despite the party’s return to power, the president must ensure that the talks do not undermine the government’s authority in cross-strait matters.
Any gap between the government’s objectives and the agenda of the KMT risks providing Chinese negotiators with an opportunity to pit these interests against one another.
In terms of the national interest, however, the KMT-CCP platform has nothing to offer. This was the case during the former DPP administration and it remains so today. Taiwan does not stand to benefit from murky contacts that undermine national sovereignty.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS