While receiving Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) on Sunday, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) praised communication between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), supporting a continued role for talks between the two parties in cross-strait relations.
At the same time, he deflected potential criticism that promoting a party-to-party platform to improve government-to-government relations smacks of a one-party state.
This he did by portraying talks between the KMT and the CCP as complementary — with limited powers — to negotiations between the Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) and the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS).
“Today, political parties can no longer dictate government policies,” Ma said, even as the KMT chairman prepared to embark on an eight-day visit to China.
The KMT was fulfilling a “responsibility,” the president said, encouraging the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to do the same following a visit to China by Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chu (陳菊), the most prominent DPP figure to cross the Strait in an official capacity.
Ma’s remarks were carefully weighed. They were an acknowledgment of public fears that the party-to-party platform may influence national concerns, which would be inappropriate for a non-transparent, non-governmental mechanism.
At the same time, Ma’s comments may have been intended to allay concerns within his party that he might reduce the scope of KMT-CCP communication.
Wu headed to China on Sunday amid speculation that Ma is unhappy with occasional differences — even friction — between his administration and the KMT headquarters and caucus.
During the KMT’s years in opposition, party-to-party talks were the KMT’s only channel for influencing cross-strait developments.
Having regained the presidency, however, the continuation of KMT-CCP talks outside SEF-ARATS negotiations, as well as the potential for disunity in the agendas pursued through the two channels, has fueled speculation that Ma is eyeing Wu’s place at the head of the KMT.
Indeed, Ma is faced with a balancing act that would make pursuing the KMT chairmanship a logical option.
With no sign that KMT-CCP talks will cease anytime soon despite the party’s return to power, the president must ensure that the talks do not undermine the government’s authority in cross-strait matters.
Any gap between the government’s objectives and the agenda of the KMT risks providing Chinese negotiators with an opportunity to pit these interests against one another.
In terms of the national interest, however, the KMT-CCP platform has nothing to offer. This was the case during the former DPP administration and it remains so today. Taiwan does not stand to benefit from murky contacts that undermine national sovereignty.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS