For more than a week, Bao Tong (鮑彤), a former senior Chinese Communist Party (CCP) official now under strict surveillance, openly promoted an insider’s account of Chinese political infighting sure to be banned in China.
The book is the posthumous memoir by Bao’s boss, Zhao Ziyang (趙紫陽), the CCP chief fired in 1989 for opposing the use of troops to quash pro-democracy protests in Tiananmen Square. Before his death in 2005, Zhao furtively recorded his insider account of that period.
When the memoir became public last week, Bao, the most senior CCP official imprisoned after the crackdown, quickly claimed responsibility. In a string of interviews with foreign news media that security officials did not initially seek to prevent, he said he had collaborated with other liberal party elders to slip the cassette recordings out of the country for publication.
“In the past, the minute these things appear, the party would say, ‘This is turmoil; we must crack down,’” he said in one telephone conversation early this week. “But if the party can maintain this current calm, then maybe it can eventually be saved.”
By Friday, though, the government’s restraint appeared to be wearing thin.
Highlights of Zhao’s memoir and audio clips of his original dictation, which were accessible for days within the mainland on the Web sites of American newspapers, including the New York Times, now appear to be blocked.
And Bao’s run of unfettered availability to the news media ended. Bao said by telephone late on Friday that he had just been informed he could no longer accept interviews “starting right now.”
Shortly beforehand, he said, security officials barred him from receiving a CBS TV crew.
Chuckling apologetically, he added: “If you want an interview with me, I’m afraid you’ll have to wait until after June 4.”
The mix of approaches — seemingly relaxed oversight at times, an iron hand at others — is characteristic of government efforts to prevent major commemorations of the June 4, 1989, crackdown without calling too much attention to Beijing’s methods.
This year, facing a number of major political anniversaries and a stumbling economy, the party has put one of its most senior officials, Vice President Xi Jinping (習近平), the presumptive heir to President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤), in charge of a special unit to “preserve stability” and to prevent unauthorized political activities.
The authorities have tended to respond to perceived threats more surgically and subtly than they might have five or 10 years ago, a number of activists said.
Top leaders now seem more sensitive to the outcry that tough tactics to suppress dissent can provoke online, overseas or within different wings of the party itself, and they often avoid immediate, draconian responses to issues like Zhao’s memoir or Bao’s interviews.
“The authorities have modified their strategy,” said a democracy advocate, Zhang Zuhua (張祖樺), a top official in the Communist Youth League in the 1980s, who was dismissed for backing the democracy protests. “They are not loosening up. But they also do not want to make trouble for themselves by creating an incident.”
He said small groups of mourners had gathered privately in Xian, Hangzhou, Shandong Province, Guangdong Province, Beijing and other places to mark June 4 early. He counted at least five or six cases of activists being interrogated, searched or stopped during activities.
But he said that to his knowledge “no one has been newly arrested because of these activities.”
On Sunday in Beijing, a contingent of more than 50 parents of young people killed in the crackdown, the Tiananmen Mothers, gathered to mourn. Zhang Xianling (張先玲), who hosted the event, said state security officials found out about their plans two or three days before but permitted the gathering, provided the parents did not stage demonstrations or invite foreign journalists or others outside their families.
The group’s gatherings this year have been larger and freer from harassment than five or 10 years ago, though security officials did stop its founder, retired professor Ding Zilin (丁子霖), from attending on Sunday.
“It’s a superficial improvement, not a fundamental one,” Zhang Xianling said.
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
Pat Gelsinger took the reins as Intel CEO three years ago with hopes of reviving the US industrial icon. He soon made a big mistake. Intel had a sweet deal going with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the giant manufacturer of semiconductors for other companies. TSMC would make chips that Intel designed, but could not produce and was offering deep discounts to Intel, four people with knowledge of the agreement said. Instead of nurturing the relationship, Gelsinger — who hoped to restore Intel’s own manufacturing prowess — offended TSMC by calling out Taiwan’s precarious relations with China. “You don’t want all of
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
In a recent essay in Foreign Affairs, titled “The Upside on Uncertainty in Taiwan,” Johns Hopkins University professor James B. Steinberg makes the argument that the concept of strategic ambiguity has kept a tenuous peace across the Taiwan Strait. In his piece, Steinberg is primarily countering the arguments of Tufts University professor Sulmaan Wasif Khan, who in his thought-provoking new book The Struggle for Taiwan does some excellent out-of-the-box thinking looking at US policy toward Taiwan from 1943 on, and doing some fascinating “what if?” exercises. Reading through Steinberg’s comments, and just starting to read Khan’s book, we could already sense that
RSS