Taiwan’s participation in the World Health Assembly (WHA) this year poses a threat to the nation.
A framework has been established in which China is the suzerain of Taiwan, and this has destroyed the “Olympic mode” that Taiwan adopted to participate in international organizations over the past 30 years.
In the “Olympic mode,” Taiwan is considered a sovereign and independent nation, neither subordinate to China nor having jurisdiction over it. The four major international organizations in which Taiwan participates under this mode include the International Olympic Committee (IOC), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), APEC and the WTO.
Taiwan cannot participate in the Olympic Games under its national title or with its national flag, so to allow it to take part in the Games, the IOC amended its charter, changing the status of all participating countries from “national committee” to “member committee.” This meant that all participating “nations” joined the Games as “IOC members” and that Taiwan and China were considered separate bodies that did not belong to one another.
When the People’s Republic of China joined the ADB in 1986, the name for Taiwan was unilaterally changed to “Taipei, China” by the bank. Even then, Taiwan was still listed under the category of “member countries.” This mode allowed Taiwan to qualify as a “member state,” which, again, was not subordinate to China.
Taiwan also joined the APEC under the “Olympic mode.” A memorandum of understanding signed in 1991 agreed that China, “Chinese Taipei” and Hong Kong joined the organization together. Each was considered a “member economy,” and each would receive an invitation from a special envoy to maintain international dignity. Taiwan and China were considered separate economies.
When Taiwan joined the WTO under the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government, this nation made a big step forward. Taiwan is able to participate in the WTO as a “separate customs territory” under the name of “Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu.” It was made clear that Taiwan and China were two separate entities that did not belong to each other.
Although Taiwan was able to attend the WHA this year, the WHO map still refers to Taiwan as part of China, eight Taiwanese seaports are still listed as Chinese and the WHO still considers Taiwan to be a province of China.
When the Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) government allowed Taiwan to become a subordinate of China through conditional participation in the WHA, it was party to the biggest humiliation of this country since it began taking part in international organizations in the 1980s.
If the government proceeds with this “one China” framework, it will cause tremendous damage to Taiwan’s international status and sovereignty.
Kuan Bi-ling is a DPP legislator.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS