Taiwan’s participation in the World Health Assembly (WHA) this year poses a threat to the nation.
A framework has been established in which China is the suzerain of Taiwan, and this has destroyed the “Olympic mode” that Taiwan adopted to participate in international organizations over the past 30 years.
In the “Olympic mode,” Taiwan is considered a sovereign and independent nation, neither subordinate to China nor having jurisdiction over it. The four major international organizations in which Taiwan participates under this mode include the International Olympic Committee (IOC), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), APEC and the WTO.
Taiwan cannot participate in the Olympic Games under its national title or with its national flag, so to allow it to take part in the Games, the IOC amended its charter, changing the status of all participating countries from “national committee” to “member committee.” This meant that all participating “nations” joined the Games as “IOC members” and that Taiwan and China were considered separate bodies that did not belong to one another.
When the People’s Republic of China joined the ADB in 1986, the name for Taiwan was unilaterally changed to “Taipei, China” by the bank. Even then, Taiwan was still listed under the category of “member countries.” This mode allowed Taiwan to qualify as a “member state,” which, again, was not subordinate to China.
Taiwan also joined the APEC under the “Olympic mode.” A memorandum of understanding signed in 1991 agreed that China, “Chinese Taipei” and Hong Kong joined the organization together. Each was considered a “member economy,” and each would receive an invitation from a special envoy to maintain international dignity. Taiwan and China were considered separate economies.
When Taiwan joined the WTO under the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government, this nation made a big step forward. Taiwan is able to participate in the WTO as a “separate customs territory” under the name of “Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu.” It was made clear that Taiwan and China were two separate entities that did not belong to each other.
Although Taiwan was able to attend the WHA this year, the WHO map still refers to Taiwan as part of China, eight Taiwanese seaports are still listed as Chinese and the WHO still considers Taiwan to be a province of China.
When the Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) government allowed Taiwan to become a subordinate of China through conditional participation in the WHA, it was party to the biggest humiliation of this country since it began taking part in international organizations in the 1980s.
If the government proceeds with this “one China” framework, it will cause tremendous damage to Taiwan’s international status and sovereignty.
Kuan Bi-ling is a DPP legislator.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS