The first anniversary of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) term of office passed this week with Ma holding a series of press conferences to reflect upon the last 12 months.
While Ma appears to be satisfied with his first year in office, the report card on his first 365 days is a mixed bag, with success in some areas and utter failure in others.
The biggest achievements during his first year have been in an area where he focuses most of his attention — relations with China.
Ma has delivered on promises to improve relations, while opening air, sea and postal links. His promises concerning Chinese tourists have also come to fruition.
But while Ma has succeeded in reducing tension across the Taiwan Strait to a degree, doing so has come at a cost. Taiwan has all but halted attempts to reach out to the rest of the world.
Lausanne-based business school IMD’s 2008 competitiveness ranking saw Taiwan’s economy drop 10 places to No. 23.
Another concern is the improvement in relations with Beijing. An invitation to attend the World Health Assembly raises concerns that the government negotiated with Beijing in secret. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) continues to usurp government authority through contacts with the Chinese Communist Party, while none of the nine cross-strait agreements signed with China has been subject to legislative scrutiny.
Meanwhile, the issue of Taiwan’s sovereignty has been buried, reduced to little more than word games with confusing and contradictory references to Taiwan, the Republic of China, “one China” and the fictional “1992 consensus” emanating from the Presidential Office.
In his inauguration speech last year, Ma said he would “rely on the Constitution to protect human rights, uphold law and order and make justice independent and impartial,” adding that “Taiwan’s democracy should not be marred by political interference in the media or electoral institutions.”
None of these promises has been delivered, with a series of well-documented incidents infringing upon human rights and the specter of state intervention in a number of institutions already apparent.
Ma’s promises to push environmental sustainability have turned out to be lip service, while morale in the military has plunged.
Ma’s biggest failure, however, has been where everybody’s hopes were the highest: the economy. Ma came to power on the back of his “6-3-3” promise: 6 percent annual GDP growth, less than 3 percent unemployment and per capita annual income of US$30,000. One year on, with almost 6 percent unemployment, negative growth and annual incomes shrinking, these figures are pie in the sky.
While the global economic crisis is responsible for the downturn in the nation’s economic fortunes, the crisis has exposed the “economic expertise” of the Ma administration as gravely inadequate.
Lacking substantial policies to reduce the effects of the crisis, the Cabinet predicts growth next quarter, saying that things will get better soon.
While officials may be upbeat about the economy, looking back over the last year, it is hard to be optimistic about much else.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS