The first anniversary of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) term of office passed this week with Ma holding a series of press conferences to reflect upon the last 12 months.
While Ma appears to be satisfied with his first year in office, the report card on his first 365 days is a mixed bag, with success in some areas and utter failure in others.
The biggest achievements during his first year have been in an area where he focuses most of his attention — relations with China.
Ma has delivered on promises to improve relations, while opening air, sea and postal links. His promises concerning Chinese tourists have also come to fruition.
But while Ma has succeeded in reducing tension across the Taiwan Strait to a degree, doing so has come at a cost. Taiwan has all but halted attempts to reach out to the rest of the world.
Lausanne-based business school IMD’s 2008 competitiveness ranking saw Taiwan’s economy drop 10 places to No. 23.
Another concern is the improvement in relations with Beijing. An invitation to attend the World Health Assembly raises concerns that the government negotiated with Beijing in secret. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) continues to usurp government authority through contacts with the Chinese Communist Party, while none of the nine cross-strait agreements signed with China has been subject to legislative scrutiny.
Meanwhile, the issue of Taiwan’s sovereignty has been buried, reduced to little more than word games with confusing and contradictory references to Taiwan, the Republic of China, “one China” and the fictional “1992 consensus” emanating from the Presidential Office.
In his inauguration speech last year, Ma said he would “rely on the Constitution to protect human rights, uphold law and order and make justice independent and impartial,” adding that “Taiwan’s democracy should not be marred by political interference in the media or electoral institutions.”
None of these promises has been delivered, with a series of well-documented incidents infringing upon human rights and the specter of state intervention in a number of institutions already apparent.
Ma’s promises to push environmental sustainability have turned out to be lip service, while morale in the military has plunged.
Ma’s biggest failure, however, has been where everybody’s hopes were the highest: the economy. Ma came to power on the back of his “6-3-3” promise: 6 percent annual GDP growth, less than 3 percent unemployment and per capita annual income of US$30,000. One year on, with almost 6 percent unemployment, negative growth and annual incomes shrinking, these figures are pie in the sky.
While the global economic crisis is responsible for the downturn in the nation’s economic fortunes, the crisis has exposed the “economic expertise” of the Ma administration as gravely inadequate.
Lacking substantial policies to reduce the effects of the crisis, the Cabinet predicts growth next quarter, saying that things will get better soon.
While officials may be upbeat about the economy, looking back over the last year, it is hard to be optimistic about much else.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS