‘Disgrace’ in Geneva
After a banquet for World Health Assembly (WHA) delegates at a restaurant in Geneva on Saturday, Department of Health Minister Yeh Ching-chuan (葉金川) was greeted by a group of Taiwanese students who confronted him with tough questions and demanded to know if Taiwan’s sovereignty had been compromised in exchange for being an observer at this year’s WHA conference.
The volley of questions annoyed the minister so much he practically told the students to get lost, calling them a disgraceful bunch. Yeh uttered words that were not befitting someone of his status.
Perhaps realizing that he had behaved childishly and anticipating an inevitable media onslaught, Yeh later held a press conference and shed tears while saying “no one loves Taiwan more than I do.”
The whole melodramatic episode deserves a closer reading. The first question is why the minister lost his cool.
The answer is that Taiwan’s sovereignty has ceased to exist since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took office. Yeh knows this and he expected the students who heckled him to be likewise informed.
The second question is why Yeh held a press conference.
On the surface, it was a pre-emptive measure against inevitable criticism from the pan-green camp and the media.
But it could also be read as a child’s cry for a pacifier. This need was satisfied when Ma sent words of support. The pan-blue media also rallied in support, giving Yeh an enormous binky by portraying the students as a reckless and disgraceful bunch.
YANG CHUNHUI
Salt Lake City, Utah
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS