The 62nd session of the World Health Assembly (WHA), the WHO’s highest decision-making body, is scheduled for today to Friday in Geneva, Switzerland. Taiwan has been blocked by China from joining the WHO over the past 12 years. This year, Beijing has agreed to let a representative of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government attend the WHA. The question is what price Taiwan will have to pay. The government has not made this clear to the public.
Beijing has employed a “carrot and stick” policy to block Taiwan from participating in the WHO. It has spread false information in the international community, claiming that the Chinese government attaches great importance to the rights and health of Taiwanese and that it is willing to cooperate with Taipei to solve health issues through appropriate channels. At the same time, it has repeatedly claimed that Taiwan is part of China and thus unqualified to join the WHO as an independent and sovereign state or to attend the WHA under any name.
China claims that Taiwan participating in the WHO would be a violation not only of UN Resolution No. 2758 but also of a resolution at the 25th session of the WHA in 1972. By this distorted reasoning, regardless of whether Taiwan applies to the WHO secretary-general for WHO membership as a country or, with the help of allies, seeks an invitation to participate in the WHA as an observer using the name “Republic of China (Taiwan),” Taipei would be creating “two Chinas” or “one China, one Taiwan.”
This would encroach on China’s sovereignty and interfere with its internal affairs, Beijing claims.
Since Ma took office, his administration has hoped that its diplomatic truce policy would elicit goodwill from China. Instead, the government’s retreat and compromise can best be described as Taiwan gives an inch and Beijing takes a mile.
By accepting the ridiculous title “Chinese Taipei,” the government has been granted observer status at the WHA through an act of charity by Beijing. This model — with China unilaterally deciding Taiwan’s participation in exchange for Taiwan’s self-denigration and sacrifice of its status as a sovereign state — has undermined our national interests. It is nothing short of a tacit confirmation to the international community that Taiwan is part of China.
If Taiwan wants to join the WHO, it should insist on admission as a full member under the name “Taiwan.” Securing membership under the name “Chinese Taipei” or any other title that belittles Taiwanese sovereignty is unacceptable.
To break through China’s diplomatic blockade, Taiwan should clearly state that it is an independent and sovereign country. The public should not tolerate the government kowtowing to Beijing or selling out national sovereignty in exchange for observer status at the WHA.
The public should protest government policies that harm Taiwan’s dignity and sovereignty.
Chen Lung-chu is the president of the Taiwan New Century Foundation.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
Yesterday, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), once the dominant political party in Taiwan and the historic bearer of Chinese republicanism, officially crowned Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) as its chairwoman. A former advocate for Taiwanese independence turned Beijing-leaning firebrand, Cheng represents the KMT’s latest metamorphosis — not toward modernity, moderation or vision, but toward denial, distortion and decline. In an interview with Deutsche Welle that has now gone viral, Cheng declared with an unsettling confidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin is “not a dictator,” but rather a “democratically elected leader.” She went on to lecture the German journalist that Russia had been “democratized
RSS